How about an anti-thanks/STFU button?

[reject]

So you know how you see a good, funny, sarcastic post, something which is either intelligent or funny and you click thanks to show your appreciation for it, why is there not a "Fuck off" button?

I always see really dumbass posts and wish I could let my discontent be known without actually having to post.

It'd be efficient and cool, you could compare the STFU's to the thanks and see if they're a good poster or not.

Thanks doesn't get abused "too" much, so I don't see why this would either.

[zombo.com]

seconded, although it's never going to happen. There would be "fuck off" gangbangs in the streets.

[Case Sensitive]

This has got to be the most suggested and most rejected idea ever.

It has been said by the admins a million times that an "anti thanks" button isn't wanted.

End of fucking story. And I suggest you use the god damn search feature for once in your life.

[zombo.com]

it's costs me nothing to leave it open for a day or two and see if anyone has come up with a compelling new logic for implementation. I don't think fish was in charge alst time it was shot down.

[reject]

And I suggest you use the god damn search feature for once in your life.

Suggest away but it's not going to happen.

[Malice]

I want it! It would provide a nice balance.

[Mr.Happy]

Why not just quote them and tell them to STFU? It's more personal that way.

[Malice]

This would add another level of fun.

[ysr2096]

No, it'd make Zoklet unduly negative. We want smiles, people!!!!!!!!!

[Vizier]

Bring back rep.

[Dfg]

*Presses the FUCK YOU button*

[reject]

*Presses the FUCK YOU button*

Haha Dfg I seriously love how bitter you get.

It makes my day to know everytime I post an update on wannabe-totse you're just sitting behind your screen raging that you're in charge of a forum which fails so hard.

[ManCannon]

"Why isn't there a 'Don't Like' button?"

[King of the world]

This has got to be the most suggested and most rejected idea ever.

It has been said by the admins a million times that an "anti thanks" button isn't wanted.

End of fucking story. And I suggest you use the god damn search feature for once in your life.

Shut up, whiney faggot.


I say yes, just so I can give a FUCK OFF to almost everyone of Ryan's posts.

[Vizier]

Haha Dfg I seriously love how bitter you get.

It makes my day to know everytime I post an update on wannabe-totse you're just sitting behind your screen raging that you're in charge of a forum which fails so hard.

You sure love riding Dfg cock huh?

[reject]

You sure love riding Dfg cock huh?

It's my life ambition to mock his website as much as possible.

[Xlite]

No.

People would just spam it on random posters for the lulz of it.
It would be the new meme.

[LavaRed]

I approve of this measure.

[LilLita]

It might eliminate a lot of useless posts of "Fuck off" and "STFU" and "Troll"....

[Captain Falcon]

I support this idea, just so i can harvest Shut The Fuck Ups. I bet i can be the most ShutTheFuckUp'd poster on zoklet in a single day. That would actually give me incentive to be an asshole and a gauge for how successful my trolling is.

[Dfg]

It's my life ambition to mock his website as much as possible.

selfpwned.

:rofl:

[Sick Boy]

selfpwned.

:rofl:


So dood's a girl? :rolleyes:

[zuperxtreme]

So you know how you see a good, funny, sarcastic post, something which is either intelligent or funny and you click thanks to show your appreciation for it, why is there not a "Fuck off" button?

I always see really dumbass posts and wish I could let my discontent be known without actually having to post.

It'd be efficient and cool, you could compare the STFU's to the thanks and see if they're a good poster or not.

Thanks doesn't get abused "too" much, so I don't see why this would either.

I like it. It's like if ebay only had positive comments, everyone would look like an angel, but that isn't the case. It would give you a quick idea of how shitty a poster is.

/does want

[zombo.com]

every scheme i try to come up with to implement this either ends in blood and tears, or massive amounts of work for someone. (say moderator verification of rep like drugs forum uses)

[reject]

selfpwned.

:rofl:

Whether you own it or not is a moot point, you think you do and became the self-appointed leader, so for all intents and purposes it is "your" site.

Especially as you're the only one who cares about it.

[reject]

every scheme i try to come up with to implement this either ends in blood and tears, or massive amounts of work for someone. (say moderator verification of rep like drugs forum uses)

I'll moderate all STFU's given.

[Shrike]

*DaGuru post*

The following users say STFU: everyone

:D:D:D

[Bleeding Kansas]

I'd like to have this. I don't think it would get out of hand. The same thing was said for Thanks, but that works well.

[Xlite]

I'd like to have this. I don't think it would get out of hand. The same thing was said for Thanks, but that works well.

Well yeah, but thanks is a good thing and you don't do good things to others unless they deserve it.

[Bleeding Kansas]

Well yeah, but thanks is a good thing and you don't do good things to others unless they deserve it.

I'd say the opposite is true for me. I do good things to people I don't know, or might not deserve it, all the time, but I don't fuck over or criticize people that don't deserve it.

[Xlite]

I don't fuck over or criticize people that don't deserve it.

But almost everyone on zoklet desevers it.

[reject]

It might encourage better posting, cos people aren't guna want negative feed back, so they'll less likely post shit.

Saying that though, the post which brought this idea to mind was a serious post, it was just phenomenally retarded.

[Bleeding Kansas]

But almost everyone on zoklet desevers it.

Then they'll get what they deserve. I at least want to try this for a short time.

[King of the world]

It might encourage better posting, cos people aren't guna want negative feed back, so they'll less likely post shit.

Saying that though, the post which brought this idea to mind was a serious post, it was just phenomenally retarded.

Wouldn't happen to have been one of Ryan1711's posts, would it?

[Sick Boy]

It might encourage better posting, cos people aren't guna want negative feed back, so they'll less likely post shit.


Problem is half these asswipes that post "It's not worth the fucking money/do real drugs/yourtopicisstupidbye" posts actually think they are contributing. Over half of "Fuck Spacebars" shit would get STFU spammed just cause how fucking retard his posts are, yet prolly wouldn't deserve it as they are usually actual legit questions no matter how dumb.

I don't think it is a bad idea. Why have a like with out a dislike?

[Winter]

No. It would be abused way too much.

[p6867]

Waits for spectral to immediately be anti thanked 3000 times in 10 posts.

[ObsidianZ]

A "thanks" button is much more prudent than an "anti-thanks" button. People easily say that they hate something, but are much more reserved about what they like.

Hate is spammable. Love is selective.


*ObZ

[reject]

Wouldn't happen to have been one of Ryan1711's posts, would it?

Could have been.

But perhaps limit it to only one STFU to one person per day, that way just cos you think someone is a cunt you can't go around spamming every post of theirs with STFU. Like you can give out multiple STFUs a day, but only one to one person, if you get me.

[pimpstrocity]

I think a STFU button would be cool, they would just have to restrict it more than thanks. Like you can only have one STFU every five days or something to keep people from spamming the fuck out of them.

[poast-bortem!]

I can't believe nobody has suggested this before...

[reject]

I can't believe nobody has suggested this before...

I'm on a roll with suggestions to make Zoklet better :cool:

My previous suggestion last week is guna be implemented, and I fully expect this one too.

[poast-bortem!]

http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/showthread.php?t=101039
http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/showthread.php?t=114245
http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/showthread.php?t=82744


I was being sarcastic man... :facepalm:

[reject]

Idc, my other thread was suggested before too.

Whether it's original or not don't matter, I'm bringing it back to the fore and this time Fish/Zok will try to make it happen.

And that middle one is hardly relevant, that's for a lol button.

[zombo.com]

i wouldn;t hold your breath.

you've got my vote. thanks and unthanks are both valueless bullshit currency's, so why shouldn't we?

so thank a bitch today. It might make his day a little brighter, and it costs you nothing.

[reject]

Was it you who turned down my thread to be able to thank yourself, when your post is just that good?

[zombo.com]

Was it you who turned down my thread to be able to thank yourself, when your post is just that good?

i didn't reject it, like i said you've got my vote.

my point is, abused, not abused, it doesn't matter. The system is meaningless on every level. (hence my random thanks gangbang up the thread)

but it's not going to happen. the ideas been ruthlessly shot down every two months since..forever.

never hurts to ask after a regime change though, maybe fish will surprise us.

[Malice]

No one should take it seriously, it would just be for fun.

[Jerk.]

Fucking do it.

[Malice]

If it happens the first thing I'm going to do is FU the OP.

[reject]

If it happens the first thing I'm going to do is FU the OP.

because the admins and mods listen to me and not you?

[zombo.com]

zuper did you stickky this, or did i get really high and not remember it?

[zuperxtreme]

lol, you musta got high. I've never stickied anything. :p

[zombo.com]

lol, you musta got high. I've never stickied anything. :p


i bet i was aiming for rejected and misclicked.

[DaGuru]

i bet i was aiming for rejected and misclicked.



Ummmm...it STILL isn't your job to "reject" what the admins haven't even commented on yet. :rolleyes:

[zombo.com]

Ummmm...it STILL isn't your job to "reject" what the admins haven't even commented on yet. :rolleyes:


Since you know my job so well, perhaps you should take care of it.

Oh yeah, no one cares what you think.

[Malice]

Fuuuuuu

Why was it rejected?!

[DaGuru]

Fuuuuuu

Why was it rejected?!

Because despite the fact there has been ZERO admin involvement, we had to defer to the mods. After re-reading the thread you'll clearly see the mod's opinions were split right down the middle....2-2.

All of THAT is completely irrelevant though, as Zos has taken it upon himself to believe his OPINION is more important than everyone else's so the the other 3 mods that did provide input were completely ignored....thusly you have a rejected idea all because one worthless loser needs to power trip with their mod perks. :(

TL/DR: Zoklet just being the usual satirical farce, what ELSE did you expect??? :eek:

[zombo.com]

because it's been rejected every couple months for at least a year, and no new arguments were brought to the table.

[Xlite]

because it's been rejected every couple months for at least a year, and no new arguments were brought to the table.

:thumbsup:

[A$AP Weed Smoker]

(screwed and chopped) I pull up in my nnnneeewwww caaaarrr.... riiiiidee byyy yaaa screeaminn Haaasstttaa Laaa Vissstaaa

[TCO420]

As if i didn't get any abused thanks :hrmph:

[Nolte]

What, like troll currency?

[Corey]

Great idea, then people wouldn't have to post negative shit proving to people their dumbasses, only for it to go in the "retarded" section

[zombo.com]

notice the whole cycle starts with people making shit posts.

[Corey]

posting anything possibly offensive while proving someone wrong**

but i think the "retarded thread" is only in BI?

Why was this rejected??!
Atleast upgrade the 'thanks' system to a reputation system where you can post why you feel its negative or whatever.