United Kingdom is the worst place to live in Europe...

[ayingerbrau]

http://www.uswitch.com/news/money/uk-worst-place-to-live-in-europe-uswitch-quality-of-life-index-890419/

I suggest getting the fuck out of the United Kingdom in 1-3 years. Learn another language (my preference would be spanish, purely due to its usage) and get the fuck out of here.

I suggest downloading "Rosetta Stone" software from the Internet and getting to grips with another language of your choice ASAP. I've heard about a few people going to Russia on the grapevine.

[007GoldenShower]

Not exactly a fitting title considering there's 50 countries in Europe and not 10... but fair enough, it's a shithole.

[reject]

I'd argue that Romania is worse.

[reject]

Not exactly a fitting title considering there's 50 countries in Europe and not 10... but fair enough, it's a shithole.

Init, how can they say the UK is worst when they only looked at 10 countries.

Anything east of Germany is a shit hole.

The title should be "UK is the worst place to live in Western Europe".

And even then Ireland is below it, so it's not even the worst.

E- OP, see the teacher after class. You'll have to re-do your homework.

[King of the world]

The overall point is it's still a shithole and there are much better countries (but atleast it's not the USA, LOL!).

The political correctness is not making for a nice place for white people to live. Let the shit skins have it for now and we'll live to fight another day. OR it's fight now. Fight or flight now, make your choice. We have less room to move around than what other countries do.

Whether it's the worst or not, it's really fucking shit which is the point.

Like I posted this link and another in another thread.
Norway, Denmark and Spain aren't bad places to move to.


Russia, Poland and Ukraine simply is the best place for white racists to move to. Obviously be well educated ready for when you move there or you won't get far.


Glory to Rus!
http://theync.com/forum/showthread.php?25818-two-jew-zoophile-beaten-by-russian-skinhead-in-forest-format-18

http://theync.com/forum/showthread.php?23064-Neo-nazi-VS-cops

http://theync.com/forum/showthread.php?17716-Russian-Neo-Nazi-s-The-quot-Immigrant-Murders-quot-...*Graphic-Beheading*

[reject]

And Poland have shit cheap beer and cigs.

Tyskie was like 50p a pint, and it's lovely.

Lucky Strike were something like £10 for 200, when they cost £6.50 or so here for 20.

[ratfrink]

^ beer is 15p a pint in Bulgaria.

[ratfrink]

Also, whilst I'm not doubting that the UK is a pretty shitty place to live, the report says that Ireland is the second-worst. Just a couple of years ago The Economist rated Ireland as the country with the best standard of living in the world. I know Ireland's financial situation is seriously shit, but could it really have gone down (at least) ten places so quickly?

Anyway, I've always been tempted to move to the Netherlands.

[Orpheus]

But it might be cheaper to live and eat in France. But it would mean that i would have to LIVE in France. Which i dont want to do. Ive already lived there for a year. So no thank you. I would rather just get the fuck out of Europe and literally anally fuck the European Union and their shit ways into next week....

[Toothlessjoe]

It's all relative, so who gives a fuck?

[Struwwelpeter]

It's all relative, so who gives a fuck?

Yeah I got typhoid fever, but it's no big deal. S'all relative.

The southern coast of Spain is nearly uninhabited, there are videos on YouTube. Because of the abundant sunlight, low population density and the easy Spanish language it may indeed be a very smart place to move. They had a total economic collapse down there and all of the rich north Europeans left. A lot of the towns there are like ghost towns. The southern region of that country is like a paradise, especially the Andalusian desert and the semi-arid regions. I would move there.

Siberia also seems nice, as do the Nordic countries.

[Struwwelpeter]

Unfortunately the industrial revolution has ruined the British countries and many other nations. Prior to the 1800s that area was ethnically homogeneous, clean, it had a stable population, it was self-sufficient and the people had everything they needed. Now, outside of the tiny rural communities, it is like a nightmare. It's the same story all over the world.

[Agent 008]

Unfortunately the industrial revolution has ruined the British countries and many other nations. Prior to the 1800s that area was ethnically homogeneous, clean, it had a stable population, it was self-sufficient and the people had everything they needed.

Yeah, like the plague.

[The Flux Capacitard]

The moral of this entire story should be that predominately white and thoroughly Westernized nations like the UK, the US, Canada, etc, when taken as a whole, are going downhill very quickly due to mass stupidity in government and most other facets of society.

I'm an American, and it truly amazes me just how bad the quality of life really is here in the US, even when compared with some of the tiny second/third world nations I've lived in. And it really, really shows in the mentality and attitudes of the people I come across. I make it a point to eavesdrop on other people's conversations when I'm in public. I watch people, and I listen. For the most part, I find that Americans are the unhappiest and most selfish group I've encountered on the planet. They're lazy, arrogant, obese, ignorant of the world, politically redneck, and for the most part, intellectually lobotomized.

The UK is exactly the same, only living costs are higher, the weather sucks ass, there's less breathing room, the government is slightly worse, and the people whinge even more than Americans. The only good thing about the UK is proper tea, fish and chips, and the fact that it's surrounded by water. Everything else is shit.

Honestly, I'm quite happy that most people from the US/UK are too stupid to realize how shitty their lifestyles are-- it provides more room for the rest of us who choose not to live among retardation.

[Struwwelpeter]

Yeah it is really amazing how third world countries are superior in every way to industrialized countries.

[reject]

The only good thing about the UK is proper tea, fish and chips, and the fact that it's surrounded by water.

And that's enough to make me want to stay here :cool:

[Agent 008]

The only good thing about the UK is proper tea, fish and chips, and the fact that it's surrounded by water.

Also this:

L_SBCUfEnXA

[ayingerbrau]

bQgXccbxHbM

[ratfrink]

Siberia also seems nice

Maybe, but it ain't in Europe either culturally or geographically.

[Struwwelpeter]

I was actually talking about western Siberia, not the way eastern, Asiatic Siberia.

I personally don't buy in to modern conventional geography. I don't buy it that nations like Georgia or Kazakhstan are in "Asia." I also don't believe western Siberia can be considered anything other than a European area.

[ayingerbrau]

http://www.britloos.co.uk/

Let's bring back our loos, they were once the envy of the world.

[ratfrink]

I was actually talking about western Siberia, not the way eastern, Asiatic Siberia.

I personally don't buy in to modern conventional geography. I don't buy it that nations like Georgia or Kazakhstan are in "Asia." I also don't believe western Siberia can be considered anything other than a European area.

I guess if you wanna say that you don't 'buy in' to geography, then I can't argue against it. I could say that I don't think Germany is in Europe. I think you've gotta assume that other people aren't aware of your special version of geography and make that clear when you post.

Anyway, Siberia has always been defined as the area eastward of the Urals (which includes the well-defined Western Siberian Plain), and 'European Russia' is almost universally accepted as only being westward of the Urals.

Whether or not Russia is a European country in any sense isn't something you can answer easily, but I don't think you can say that Siberia is particularly European culturally (even in the cities I'd doubt that it's any more traditionally European than any other large city in Eurasia), and definitely not geographically. I'd like to know how you consider it to be European.

Besides, Siberia isn't a country, it's a region. It's not even a region within a country, either (unless you're talking about the Russian Federation's administrative area); it spans a few different countries.


What makes you wanna live there anyway? From what I've read, it's (just as you'd expect) okay in the cities but really fucking poor and underdeveloped in the countryside (which is great until your family needs to get to a hospital).

[King of the world]

The appreciation and fun to be had in countries like Russia is more than enough reason to move there. Unless you're a pussy that is.

I guess I'll post the most "prosperous" nations in this thread as well, since it somewhat links with the op matter at hand.
http://money.uk.msn.com/news/world-economy/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=155090518&page=1

I've heard a lot of decent things about Denmark. I'd still be pretty set on Russia or Ukraine, with experience of having been in both countries before as well. The fact you have to have some wits about you to get on there and the people aren't westernized jew-thinking pricks makes for a generally awesome place to live.

Plus LOTS of snow :thumbsup:
Can't beat a shit load of snow, such a lovely atmosphere.


Been considering czech republic too, not to mention the cocaine there is brilliant, as a few people on this website have been let known ;)

[Struwwelpeter]

I never said Siberia was a country. Poor, scarcely populated wooded areas are best because there is more tranquility, ineffective or nonexistent law enforcement, cleaner air, wildlife, etc. Cities suck.

[Struwwelpeter]

As for how it is European, I guess if you can't see that you never will. I am of the school of thought that says Iran is just southeast Europe, maybe that will open your litter dumbass eyes.

[Agent 008]

None of you pricks would survive a year in Russia.

[King of the world]

That's another great thing about Russia as you can see in the vids I posted earlier; the forests :thumbsup:;)


Hey, Jim. I know from your past posts you've an interest in anthropology and in primitivism. Check out The Hunting Peoples, by Carleton S. Coon, published by Little, Brown and Company, Boston and Toronto, 1971. It gives numerous examples in hunting and gathering societies of violence by human beings against other human beings.

Coon makes clear (pages XIX, 3, 4, 9, 10) that he admires hunter gatherer peoples and regards them as foner than "civilized" ones.

Carleton Coon has a lot of great work, as you should well know, such as The Races of Europe and The Origin of Races.

[King of the world]

None of you pricks would survive a year in Russia.

Not every one is a pussy like you, Agent008.

[King of the world]

White Britons a Minority by ‘66

Graeme Wilson, The Sun (London), Nov. 18, 2010

WHITE British people will be in a MINORITY in their own country by 2066, an expert warned last night.

David Coleman, professor of demography at Oxford University, said they will make up less than HALF the population in just over 50 years.

And soaring immigrant birthrates mean white British kids will be in a minority of youngsters in the UK even sooner. The dramatic decline will be fuelled by record-breaking levels of immigration, coupled with the departure of thousands of Brits for a better life abroad, the population analyst said.

Prof Coleman’s controversial claim will raise fresh questions about whether Britain can sustain the influx of hundreds of thousands of immigrants every year.

It comes as Home Secretary Theresa May today gets a report from the Migration Advisory Committee on what cap she should impose on migrant workers next year.

Writing in Prospect magazine, Prof Coleman warned the huge numbers of foreigners landing on our shores will “transform” the UK.

He said official projections estimate the UK’s population will rocket to 77 million by 2051—and 85 million by 2083.

The expert went on: “On those assumptions the ‘white British’ population would decline to 45 million (59 per cent of the total) by 2051.

“Were the assumptions to hold, the ‘white British’ population of Britain would become the minority after about 2066. It’s a milestone that would be passed much earlier in younger age-groups.”

He added: “The US, by comparison, is now about 65 per cent white (non-Hispanic) and that group is projected to fall to 50 per cent by 2045.”

Even if the number of immigrants was cut so that new arrivals matched the number of Brits leaving, the “white British” population would still fall below 50 per cent by the end of the century.

Prof Coleman said this would “represent an enormous change to national identity—cultural, political, economic and religious”.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3234028/Oxford-professor-issues-shock-population-warning-for-Great-Britain-by-2066.html#ixzz15bAcxfjK

Well that comes as no surprise, everyone knows it, but won't speak out about it or do anything about it. It's disgusting really. In terms of Non-white immigration France is just as bad.

France is now a nation of illegal immigrants where the indigenous French are a minority in their own country.
http://www.imgplace.com/viewimg201/1537/32carteu.jpg

First ethnic statistics ever published in France reveal 54% of babies born in Paris
are Black.

In France, ethnic statistics are outlawed (which should raise alarm bells to begin with).

But they left a flaw in their system: drepanocytosis is a genetic illness that affects Blacks.

This just the black population, don't forget Pakis, racially-mixed arabs and everyone else.

It is illegal for the French state to collect data on ethnicity and race, a law with its origins in the 1789 revolution and reaffirmed in the constitution of 1958.[188] Nonetheless, approximately six million of France's population are of North African descent while an estimated 2.5 million of the population are Black Africans.[189][190] It is currently estimated that 40% of the French population descends at least partially from the different waves of immigration the country has received.[191] Between 1921 and 1935 about 1.1 million net immigrants came to France.[192] An estimated 1.6 million European pieds noirs returned to France as the country's North African possessions gained independence.[193][194]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France#Population

[reject]

I'll be dead by 2066, so who cares.

[King of the world]

I'll be dead by 2066, so who cares.

I feel for your kids and their kids if you have any. But hey, it's your decision not to care; I won't tell you that you should. It's disappointing though.

[SnowmanJoe]

well, the white nations have had their fun, it's time for the 3rd world to step forward. looking forward to the day when white people are like living fossils, put in museums.
jkzz :)

[King of the world]

time for the 3rd world to step forward. looking forward

LOL! Never going to happen with those dumb shits.

Douglas A. McIntyre, Charles B. Stockdale, and Michael B. Sauter, 24/7 Wall St., July 6, 2010

{snip}

{snip} Eighteen of the poorest countries by GDP per capita are in Africa. That is not surprising given the famine and war that have racked the continent for the better part of the last four decades. Contributing to these hardships is that many of these countries were recently territories or protectorates of European nations.

The concentration of poverty and the lack of national productivity would have looked very different five decades ago. In the 1960s, China and India were relatively poor nations, with huge populations, low literacy rates, and tremendous untapped resources. {snip}

Most of the poorest nations in Africa do not have effective central governments due to instability and civil war. Corrupt officials at all levels bleed money from the economy, “redirecting” aid from the West and “taxing” whatever the country’s immature industries produce on their own.

Many of Africa’s nations are resource-rich. Some have taken advantage of it. Nigeria is one of the largest oil-producing nations in the world. Meanwhile, other African countries with significant natural resources, like the Democratic Republic of Congo, do not have access to the capital needed to create an infrastructure that could exploit its resources.

The greatest problem for many of these counties is that they have limited means to improve their financial conditions. Some do not have arable land, others have negligible deposits of metal, oil, or gas. Each one been perpetually poor. And with a few exceptions, there is only modest hope that their situations will improve in the decades to come. They must rely on whatever aid they receive from the West, and perhaps Russia and China. They are now and likely will remain the poorest nations.


20) Republic of Haiti

*Population: 9.2 million
*GDP (ppp): $11.5 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,338

The poorest nation outside of the African continent, {snip}.


19) Burkina Faso

*Population: 16.2 million
*GDP (ppp): $17.7 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,304

The infrastructure of this west African nation has been plagued by frequent droughts and several coups since the 1980s. This country’s main export is cotton, which due partly to these intense droughts and heavy fluctuations in the industry, has been an unreliable cash crop.


18) Federal Republic of Nepal

*Population: 28.9 million
*GDP (ppp): $31.5 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,205

Land-locked and isolated, one-third of Nepal’s GDP comes from small-time agriculture. Like Burkina Faso, the country has experienced much political instability over the past few decades. While the nation has significant potential for the development of a hydroelectric power infrastructure, this instability, coupled with the nation’s propensity for natural disasters, has left this resource largely untapped.


17) Republic of Uganda

*Population: 33.4 million
*GDP (ppp): $36.9 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,195

Uganda has a great deal of potential with its vast natural resources, particularly precious metals and minerals. {snip} The underdevelopment of a mining infrastructure, as well as a general lack of industrialization, is largely due to large-scale civil unrest and international conflict with neighboring countries, {snip}.


16) Republic of Mali

*Population: 13.7 million
*GDP (ppp): $15 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,172

Another agriculture-heavy region, densely populated Mali relies heavily on its tobacco industry, which makes up at least 50% of total exports. {snip} In particular, the unpredictable and unreliable availability of utilities, including electricity, water and telecommunications has deterred foreign investors and hampered development.


15) Republic of Rwanda

*Population: 11,055,976
*GDP (ppp): $9.9 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $1,149

{snip} Like several others on this list, this nation is rich in minerals. Efforts to develop this resource, aided by the international perception of increased stability after nearly 1 million deaths during the genocide, have caused mineral production to replace coffee and tea as Rwanda’s main export.


14) Republic of Guinea

*Population: 10.3 million
*GDP (ppp): $10.3 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $991

Guinea retains significant potential in agricultural and mineral resources, as well as hydroelectric development, but a wide range of issues, including a literacy rate of less than 30% and political uncertainty, has left these industries underdeveloped.


13) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

*Population: 88 million
*GDP (ppp): $70.9 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $954

One of the largest and poorest of the African nations, Ethiopia relies heavily on agricultural exports (particularly coffee) to sustain GDP. Heavy droughts, poor farming practices, price fluctuations, and a two-year war with Eritrea hurt the industry, causing many coffee growers to switch to other crops. {snip}


12) Republic of Mozambique

*Population: 22 million
*GDP (ppp): $18.6 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $933

{snip} Working against massive foreign debt with the aid of international organizations, the nation has managed to garner some attention from investors and has developed a sizable aluminum industry. The growth and export potential of the aluminum industry has been hampered by a sharp drop in the price of the metal since the global economic recession.


11) Republic of Madagascar

*Population: 21.3 million
*GDP (ppp): $19.7 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $932

Until 1990, Madagascar had a socialist-oriented government, which was replaced by one which has relied heavily on the IMF for economic guidance. {snip}


10) Republic of Malawi

*Population: 15.4 million
*GDP (ppp): $11.3 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $884

{snip} high levels of poverty, HIV/Aids and corruption continue to burden Malawi, one of the world’s most densely populated and least developed countries. In addition, the overuse of agricultural land—the nation’s primary natural resource—has contributed to over half of the Malawian population living below the poverty line. There are plans for exploiting the country’s uranium reserves.


9) Togolese Republic (Togo)

*Population: 6.2 million
*GDP (ppp): $5.3 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $826

Experiencing ongoing political unrest since gaining independence from France in 1960, Togo is considered to be one of the world’s poorest countries. Led by the universally condemned President Faure Gnassingbe, son of the corrupt political leader Gnassingbe Eyadema, Togo has only recently begun to rebuild its relationship with the international community after years of human rights violations. {snip}


8) Republic of Sierra Leone

*Population: 5.2 million
*GDP (ppp): $4.3 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $759

Although rich in minerals and agricultural resources, Sierra Leone suffered a ten-year war, which ended in 2002. {snip} The export of diamonds, often called “blood diamonds,” benefits only a small minority of the country. {snip}


7) Central African Republic

*Population: 4.8 million
*GDP (ppp): $3.2 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $745

A site of constant political turmoil, the CAR has undergone three decades of bumbling military dictatorships, a decade of unruly civilian government, and an unstable transitional government established by a military coup. All of this has happened since gaining independence from France in 1960. There is great potential for economic growth within CAR’s timber and diamond industries, however years of corruption and political instability have undermined this progress.


6) Republic of Niger

*Population: 15.9 million
*GDP (ppp): $10.1 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $719

{snip} These facts, in addition to Niger’s prolonged history of post-independence military rule, keep the nation as one of the poorest in the world, devastated by disease and corruption.


5) State of Eritrea

*Population: 5.8 million
*GDP (ppp): $3.7 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $679

{snip} The country’s single party government, run by the People’s Front for Democracy and Justice, maintains total control over the economy through military force and the expansion of government-owned businesses.


4) Republic of Liberia

*Population: 3.7 million
*GDP (ppp): $1.4 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $424

As a result of years of civil war and a cycle of incompetent government administrations, Liberia has suffered extensive economic hardships since a 1980 military coup led by Samuel Doe. Fortunately, an abundance of water, timber, and mineral resources offer a chance for salvation for to the nation’s war-ravaged infrastructure.


3) Republic of Burundi

*Population: 9.8 million
*GDP (ppp): $3 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $400

Having recently emerged from a civil war between the Hutu and Tutsi factions, Burundi’s economy faces many challenges. It is landlocked, lacking in resources, largely uneducated (only one in two children attend school), and one in every fifteen adults has HIV/Aids. {snip}


2) Republic of Zimbabwe

*Population: 11.6 million
*GDP (ppp): $332 MILLION (note: whoa!)
*$GDP Per Capita: $354

One of, if not the poorest nation in the world, Zimbabwe’s economy has suffered from war with the Democratic Republic of Congo and hyperinflation as a result of the overprinting of currency. A violent land redistribution campaign has scared away most potential foreign investors.


1) Democratic Republic of Congo

*Population: 70.9 million
*GDP (ppp): $20.6 billion
*$GDP Per Capita: $332

Although rich with economic resources, the Democratic Republic of Congo has suffered from war and corruption since its independence in 1960. Once the second most industrialized country in Africa, it now has in the lowest GDP per capita in the world. {snip}
http://247wallst.com/2010/07/06/the-twenty-poorest-nations-in-the-world/

Haiti used to be thriving until the blacks took over. Mali wasn't too bad when the arabs were running it and have niggers in slavery either, before then it was shit and today it is shit.

[reject]

I feel for your kids and their kids if you have any. But hey, it's your decision not to care; I won't tell you that you should. It's disappointing though.

My kids can deal with it.

I'll just teach them to man the fuck up whilst I'm still kicking.

[King of the world]

My kids can deal with it.

I'll just teach them to man the fuck up whilst I'm still kicking.

Good plan. Doubt many other people will do that, many whites today are losing their rights to these scumbags just because they let them walk all over them and are too pacifist. With the way things are going, it's either start making a change now while we still have the tiniest bit of room to move around, or a much harder life later, with a more minimal survival chance.

Think Detroit.

[constantinople]

Unfortunately the industrial revolution has ruined the British countries and many other nations. Prior to the 1800s that area was ethnically homogeneous, clean, it had a stable population, it was self-sufficient and the people had everything they needed. Now, outside of the tiny rural communities, it is like a nightmare. It's the same story all over the world.

the UK was never self-sufficient. Read a history book.

[King of the world]

the UK was never self-sufficient. Read a history book.

0/10

Try again later.

[constantinople]

0/10

Try again later.

You think you are correct...but you are not. Try again later. An island nation who completely relied on trade to support it's populace=/=self sufficient.

[reject]

the UK was never self-sufficient. Read a history book.

Nigger's just jealous that America can't build an empire the same size as Britains.

[Shrike]

The uk is great, you're all just jealous whiners.

[southernsun]

My aim within the next 10 years is to move to sunny Ibiza, open up a nice cafe/bar and chill the fuck out.

[reject]

My aim within the next 10 years is to move to sunny Ibiza, open up a nice cafe/bar and chill the fuck out.

I hope you're joking.

[Agent 008]

My aim within the next 10 years is to move to sunny Ibiza, open up a nice cafe/bar and chill the fuck out.

Ibiza of all places?

[SHH]

I'd say Chechnya is the worst place in Europe to live. I mean, it is a war zone.

[constantinople]

Nigger's just jealous that America can't build an empire the same size as Britains.

Our empire is currently 5 or six times bigger than yours at least, going by just landmass. thanks.

[reject]

Our empire is currently 5 or six times bigger than yours at least, going by just landmass. thanks.

Except it's all one land mass, minus Hawaii, even I could manage that.

No, try being a tiny island nation and taking over 3/4 of the globe. You can't, America would fail. They can't even conquer Vietnam and Iraq.

The sun never set in the British Empire.

[constantinople]

Except it's all one land mass, minus Hawaii, even I could manage that.

No, try being a tiny island nation and taking over 3/4 of the globe. You can't, America would fail. They can't even conquer Vietnam and Iraq.

The sun never set in the British Empire.

Excuse me, what does Britain control in the present day?:smug: What "one big land mass" did England utterly fail at controlling? :smug:

Our intention was never to conquer either of those two nations. Infact, America has never tried to "conquer" any other nation as far as I know. We have no interest in annexing a shit hole like Iraq into the Union.

All it took was a skinny twig of a man and he kicked yalls asses straight out of India like a bunch of little girls with a skinned knee.

[reject]

Excuse me, what does Britain control in the present day?:smug: What "one big land mass" did England utterly fail at controlling? :smug:

Our intention was never to conquer either of those two nations. Infact, America has never tried to "conquer" any other nation as far as I know. We have no interest in annexing a shit hole like Iraq into the Union.

All it took was a skinny twig of a man and he kicked yalls asses straight out of India like a bunch of little girls with a skinned knee.

The Queen is still head of state of many nations.

We only failed at controlling it because our commanders were too busy playing card games to be arsed with keeping America. You didn't win the war of Independence due to being good, you won it due to the French and us not really caring about it.

That's only not your intention because you can't. If you could, you would. You can't, so you make out you don't want to.

Also all it took was some poorly trained farmers to defeat your entire military.

[Agent 008]

Our intention was never to conquer either of those two nations. Infact, America has never tried to "conquer" any other nation as far as I know. We have no interest in annexing a shit hole like Iraq into the Union.

And there is your problem.

[SHH]

The Queen is still head of state of many nations.

We only failed at controlling it because our commanders were too busy playing card games to be arsed with keeping America. You didn't win the war of Independence due to being good, you won it due to the French and us not really caring about it.

That's only not your intention because you can't. If you could, you would. You can't, so you make out you don't want to.

Also all it took was some poorly trained farmers to defeat your entire military.

As if the UK isn't getting their ass kicked in Afghanistan, and hasn't got their ass kicked out of every continent on the globe. Usually by untrained militias too.

[reject]

As if the UK isn't getting their ass kicked in Afghanistan, and hasn't got their ass kicked out of every continent on the globe. Usually by untrained militias too.

Naw our problem is we lose when fighting with America.

That's why we so categorically won the Falklands, we didn't have the yanks next to us making things worse.

In conflicts/wars with America, it's allies just continually have to facepalm, stopping them from fighting and winning efficiently.

[King of the world]

Non of the wars have been for our nation's benefit for a LONG time. Most of the people in the military are absolute fucking morons with a pretentious aura the moment they first come home to mummy on leave, when most are infact actual pussies with no real experience other than in cooking :rolleyes:

The same goes for you pussies across the pond too. Infact yours are even bigger assholes and meathead losers.

War today is a racket.
There are a few people in there for good, purposeful reasons which I won't go into; but it's not wise.

[reject]

If I wasn't a lazy, unfit fuck I'd join the army.

Obviously not infantry, but hopefully something equally fun.

I reckon it'd be pretty fun. It's not like a boring 9 to 5 job. You get to explore the world and get fit and just dunno, it's something interesting and exciting. Meet and help loads of people in far away countries. And all my dad and both grandparents were in the army (albeit one of my Granddad's was in the Nazi Army ha).

It's just cos it's full of dicks which puts me off.

[King of the world]

(albeit one of my Granddad's was in the Nazi Army ha).

Any stories to tell? I'm always fascinated to hear from a few of my friends who had grandfathers as part of the national socialists (mainly part of the ss branch but some of the actual Wehrmacht Heer).

[reject]

His parents were both German but he was born in Poland. Originally was in the Polish army when Germany invaded, was lucky to be on the Eastern side. Due to his Germanic roots and I guess cos Germany just needed any soldiers they could get anyway, he was sweeped up into their army.

Guess he fought with them for a few years until Stalingrad. Was involved there and taken POW by the Soviets, ended up in a Russian POW camp where he was made to stand in frozen fields all day, had severe frost bite in his feet.

Ended up coming to England somehow, guess a POW swap or something few years after the war, fuck knows, met my Grandma, and lived here til he died in 1980 or so.

I don't know any real specific details, he died 10 or so years before I was born. Apparently he never spoke of what happened anyway.

If I had one wish in this life, it's to meet and speak to him.

[upinsmoke]

The uk sucks ass. England is a shit hole. London being the biggest shit hole.

Prices are high. the authority is on some kind of power trip screwing the people and the country further in to the ground.

the food is ok if you get fresh stuff from anywhere other then sueprmarkets
because the meat and food in there is shit full of crap and the meat well they where all fed on antibiotics and god know what other crap before they where killed.

life is stressful. retiring age is going up. when you retire you hardly get fuck all to live on.

the system is easy to work if you know how. We are flooded with coloured people from god knows where "all over the world i bet"

we got royalty but they are a royal pain in the ass so are the police.
there are more rules then you could ever want.

you cant go anywhere without being watched by cctv and step one foot out of place and the Gestapo breathe down your neck
we have no justice.

now for the good stuff.
Wait is there any? Yes

The air ports and the Ferry ports and the euro star.
They are the only good thing about England really because you can go to these place and leave England.

Get a ticket ,get lost in France or Spain or some where nice. Even Poland £1.60 for smokes a few more pounds for some vodka nice polish woman.
watch euro trip get inspired. Even go to amsterdam and get as high as a kite.

I would go with getting lost in the south of France for good.
never return. have a nice laid back life. possibly boring? who knows but it would beat the shit you have to encounter here daily.

I am so leaving England before Christmas for a fucking break man fuck England. its a nice feeling when you are sitting there watching England get further and further away from you. you can see it vanish in to the distance and when your mobile phone says Orange Fr you know your away from good old England.

[reject]

^ http://www.londonleben.co.uk/london_leben/2006/10/this_country.html

Courtesy of stumble.

"This is the country that created a comedy born out of this unique sense of humour, because life is short and if you can't laugh about yourself and about almost anything in life, what’s it all about anyway? This is the country where you queue and you order an all day breakfast, all day long, either just because you adore it or you simply got hammered last night. This is the country where you drive on the right side, which is without a doubt the left-hand side, where you speed through thousands of roundabouts because traffic lights are bloody useless anyway – you know what I mean, don't you?"

[reject]

"This is the country that lives and thrives because it is built on an island, and if you don't understand the sea you will never ever understand the country or the people who live on it. And this is the country that doesn't excel in that many aspects. Instead its used to being second or third, but what the hell. And still this country seems to think that it should play a role as a world power and apart from those stupid politicians every inhabitant of this country knows deep down that it doesn't work. It just doesn't. But in this country one learns how one should lose. With dignity. And with pride. And with a good laugh, for crying out loud."

[Shrike]

Tbh, you only have to look at the way the cities and towns are laid out to see the difference. Here, they're organic, streets curve round hills and houses and old plots of land and churches etc.

In america they are planned out on a grid and you find an address by referencing its number up one grid and down the next. How boring can you get?

[Agent 008]

Tbh, you only have to look at the way the cities and towns are laid out to see the difference. Here, they're organic, streets curve round hills and houses and old plots of land and churches etc.

In america they are planned out on a grid and you find an address by referencing its number up one grid and down the next. How boring can you get?

Yep, that's America. Boring but efficient, and you get much more for your money.

[p6867]

Tbh, you only have to look at the way the cities and towns are laid out to see the difference. Here, they're organic, streets curve round hills and houses and old plots of land and churches etc.

In america they are planned out on a grid and you find an address by referencing its number up one grid and down the next. How boring can you get?

I live in boston, which is not laid out that way as it predates the car. New York is and it's a good thing because it's huge. If the UK had been settled and developed as late as the western US was then urban planners would have been involved in your development as well. And everything is illegal there right?

Nigger's just jealous that America can't build an empire the same size as Britains.

Countries with US military personnel.
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Antigua
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo
Costa Rica
Cote D’Ivoire
Cuba (Guantanamo)
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Diego Garcia
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Guatemala
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Liberia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mali
Malta
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
Sudan
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

[Toothlessjoe]

lol @ people thinking they also lay claim to what others are doing/have done (read: patriotism).

[constantinople]

Naw our problem is we lose when fighting with America.

That's why we so categorically won the Falklands, we didn't have the yanks next to us making things worse.

In conflicts/wars with America, it's allies just continually have to facepalm, stopping them from fighting and winning efficiently.

The Falklands is not shit. You call that a war? You call fighting some island dwelling pygmy fucks a war?


America's Navy is larger than the next 12 nations combined. We would have won the war BETTER.

[constantinople]

Tbh, you only have to look at the way the cities and towns are laid out to see the difference. Here, they're organic, streets curve round hills and houses and old plots of land and churches etc.

In america they are planned out on a grid and you find an address by referencing its number up one grid and down the next. How boring can you get?

This is true for some parts of America. There's still fuckloads of little towns. The real fact of the matter is that America's topography is so varied and different from Englands that it's just hard to compare something like that. Necessity forces us to do things like make roads in grids for the sake of efficiency and less traffic.

I will say this though: All the roads in Texas are fucking long beautiful WIDE black strips of asphalt that stretch on unbroken and LEVEL for hundreds of miles. The roads in the UK are shit.

[Shrike]

I will say that it's funny you think that's a good thing.

[SnowmanJoe]

Tbh, you only have to look at the way the cities and towns are laid out to see the difference. Here, they're organic, streets curve round hills and houses and old plots of land and churches etc.

In america they are planned out on a grid and you find an address by referencing its number up one grid and down the next. How boring can you get?

not if you're trying to find a fucking house in the middle of nowhere, being there for the first time :mad::mad: fucking stupid names and postcodes:mad::mad::mad::mad: