faggots = natures way to limit the weak from reproducing

[testerman]

same with pedohiles and perverts who do not PREFER ejaculation into the vagina.

[Vizier]

Well it cetainly hasn't stopped the stupid inbred rednecklike people from around the world to reproduce now, has it?

[testerman]

Well it cetainly hasn't stopped the stupid inbred rednecklike people from around the world to reproduce now, has it?

I am only talking about White people/humans. not animals like negros or mexicans. How animals breed is of little importance to the future of civilization. Thus, your input has no weight here.

[Vizier]

Oh my bad, go on then. :rolleyes:

[bortmackie]

What do you mean by weak? Do you mean that gay people are less physically strong than others? Because i'm not sure physical strength has any effect on how adaptive/likely to reproduce a human is. Maybe in third world countries, but not in the developed world. If that's not what you meant, feel free to clarify, but i'm just going to tell you it's bullshit anyways. Homosexuality is not something that nature just "came up with." Sexual identity develops over time, and is dependent on too many environmental conditions for it to just be because someone is 'weak.'

[testerman]

Oh my bad, go on then.


Thanks. I do appreciate it, even if you are 1/2 joking

[testerman]

What do you mean by weak? Do you mean that gay people are less physically strong than others? Because i'm not sure physical strength has any effect on how adaptive/likely to reproduce a human is. Maybe in third world countries, but not in the developed world. If that's not what you meant, feel free to clarify, but i'm just going to tell you it's bullshit anyways. Homosexuality is not something that nature just "came up with." Sexual identity develops over time, and is dependent on too many environmental conditions for it to just be because someone is 'weak.'

strength more mental and physical, but still both. I do not believe that something that is COMMON is just by accident. nature does not create problems like that in single digit percentages (which comes out to a lot) of an organism's population for no reason.

[bortmackie]

Okay, but don't you think scientists would have found a pattern amongst homosexuals if there was one? I mean, all parents today worry about is "how can i make sure my child doesn't end up a faggot?" If there was some sort of correlation between homosexuality and weakness, we'd have found it by now.

[testerman]

Okay, but don't you think scientists would have found a pattern amongst homosexuals if there was one? I mean, all parents today worry about is "how can i make sure my child doesn't end up a faggot?" If there was some sort of correlation between homosexuality and weakness, we'd have found it by now.

A lot of jews are faggots, and they are weaker, mentally and physically (smaller, slimmer, and they are always bitching about their mental problems). I know that's just one example and doesnt prove the rule. I know I'll have a problem proving this. But IMO there is a weakness of mind adn spirit which seems prevalent in the faggots I've seen. same with any non-vagino-phile. There's also PC considerations where science is not going to propose such a thing out of fear. Thus I propose considering it as a working theory and seeing how true it seems over time.

[King of the world]

Faggotry is an abnormality in nature, but it isn't "unnatural". Homosexuality is not genetic, it is caused by environmental factors (by environment I don't mean thinks like socio-economic status and the like).

The Bailey and Pillard twins study most often referred to by faggot activist groups is misinterpreted. The study found that among those twins studied, the researchers found a rate of homosexuality of 52% (both twins homosexuals); 22% among non-identical twins; and a 9.2% rate among non-twins.

The study unsurprisingly proved the opposite to the claims that homosexuality is genetic. Byrd, et al, wrote: "This study actually provides support for environmental factors. If homosexuality were in the genetic code, all of the identical twins would have been homosexual."

Staying consistant with evolution, homosexuality is not a stable strategy and seems unlikely to have a genetic origin and I have seen no such empirical evidence to prove otherwise. A homosexual individual is less likely to produce children and as such would imply that conditioning for homosexuality takes place during the lifetime of the individual.

I believe this to be an accurate summary of the cause of homosexuality:
"So, if a child perceives that his father does not want a relationship with him, that child might try a few times to connect with his father, but will eventually retract in self-protection. This is called defensive detachment. Upon sensing rejection, the boy chooses to reject the father in return. He detaches from the father and even what the father represents, which is masculinity (Nicolosi & Nicolosi, 2001). Typically at this point, he will stay connected to the mother and will instead soak in femininity. Usually he is also surrounded by other female figures, such as, a sister, an aunt, or a grandmother. So at a time when he is craving masculine input and seeking to understand himself in terms of his male identity, he instead receives feminine input and begins to develop a sense of the feminine.

By the time this child enters school, he often has a difficult time relating with other boys. Either he is just more comfortable with the girls, who are more familiar to him, or he is intimidated by the boys. Often this child sees himself as different from the other boys. So he may hold back from bonding with them. If he has developed any feminine mannerisms, he might also be rejected by the other boys and quite possibly even ridiculed. He is craving acceptance from the other boys and continues to need this acceptance, though the need goes unmet. The boy watches the other boys from afar, he longs to be noticed by them, and included by them, yet he remains with the girls, further gaining a sense of the feminine while deeply craving the masculine."
http://www.narth.com/docs/hom101.html

Here's something interesting to keep in mind too...
The nature versus nurture debate just took an unexpected turn -- thanks to pollution.

Increased exposure to the toxic chemical mercury can affect sexual preference in certain species of birds -- inducing homosexuality, a new study has revealed.

Peter Frederick, an ecologist from the University of Florida, and Nilmini Jayasena from the University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka found that male American white ibises that consumed methylmercury, the most toxic and easily digested form of mercury found in the environment, were more likely to pair with other males. In wild ibis populations with no mercury exposure, same-sex pairing is non-existent.

"We knew that mercury was likely to affect reproductive hormones from an earlier study," Frederick told FoxNews.com, "so we suspected some aspect of reproduction would be affected, like whether the birds came into reproductive condition or whether they were too aggressive to pair."

"We had no clue that mate choice might be involved," he added.

Birds living in wetlands, such as the ibises, are most vulnerable because the environment is a breeding ground for bacteria that convert the mercury spewed from coal-fired power plants into methylmercury, which "is at least ten times as toxic as the stuff in a thermometer," Frederick said.

Mercury becomes methylated only when it comes in contact with bacteria in anoxic environments, those that use sulfur instead of oxygen for metabolism. And that process is common in wetlands and shallow aquatic areas, Frederick said.

"The implication is that this is probably happening in wild bird populations," Frederick told Nature magazine.

Frederick and Jayasena studied 160 white ibis nestlings over a three-year period. They found that males with higher levels of mercury were less likely to be approached by females and had a higher chance of being involved in a homosexual pairing. As the level of mercury exposure increased, so did the degree and persistence of homosexual pairing.

Frederick believes that the methylmercury, a known endocrine disruptor, is affecting hormone levels in exposed birds.

While the team hopes their findings sheds light on the effects of mercury pollution, Frederick makes clear that people shouldn’t think that humans ingesting mercury will suddenly become gay. "I want to be very explicit that this study has nothing to say about that," he told Nature.

That said, mercury pollution is a danger to humans for a variety of other reasons: It's known to affect developing fetuses and has degenerative effects on many human organs.

"There are numerous reasons why cleaning up the environment for birds also reduces risk for humans," Frederick said.

The results of the study are published in the current issue of Royal Society B.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/02/pollution-causes-homosexuality-birds-studies/?test=faces


As for my opinion on butt-banging fags, they should not have collective influence and have the right to be publicly gay. Public homosexuality ideally should be a criminal offence and not encouraged as a healthy and progressive lifestyle, I don't necessarily think it should result in capital punishment for it, hard labour yes (I'm sure most fags would voluntarily sign up). There will always be homosexuals, but the influence of it can be stopped and the closet door shut.

The health risks of homosexuality should be made widely public. I've gradually lost tolerance of homosexuals, they have NO rights whatsoever as long as they come out as homosexual. It is a deviant, perverse and disease spreading culture and sexuality.


Not all queers are necessarily weak, but they are all abnormal.

[testerman]

Faggotry is an abnormality in nature, but it isn't "unnatural". Homosexuality is not genetic, it is caused by environmental factors (by environment I don't mean thinks like socio-economic status and the like).

The Bailey and Pillard twins study most often referred to by faggot activist groups is misinterpreted. The study found that among those twins studied, the researchers found a rate of homosexuality of 52% (both twins homosexuals); 22% among non-identical twins; and a 9.2% rate among non-twins.

The study unsurprisingly proved the opposite to the claims that homosexuality is genetic. Byrd, et al, wrote: "This study actually provides support for environmental factors. If homosexuality were in the genetic code, all of the identical twins would have been homosexual."

Staying consistant with evolution, homosexuality is not a stable strategy and seems unlikely to have a genetic origin and I have seen no such empirical evidence to prove otherwise. A homosexual individual is less likely to produce children and as such would imply that conditioning for homosexuality takes place during the lifetime of the individual.

I believe this to be an accurate summary of the cause of homosexuality:

http://www.narth.com/docs/hom101.html

Here's something interesting to keep in mind too...



As for my opinion on butt-banging fags, they should not have collective influence and have the right to be publicly gay. Public homosexuality ideally should be a criminal offence and not encouraged as a healthy and progressive lifestyle, I don't necessarily think it should result in capital punishment for it, hard labour yes (I'm sure most fags would voluntarily sign up). There will always be homosexuals, but the influence of it can be stopped and the closet door shut.

The health risks of homosexuality should be made widely public. I've gradually lost tolerance of homosexuals, they have NO rights whatsoever as long as they come out as homosexual. It is a deviant, perverse and disease spreading culture and sexuality.


I do not think that being a mama's boy means you are gay. there's no one-to-one association there. There are a lot of boys with no father that are not gay. I don't see any correspondence there.
That study you mention - Are you saying that 52% of all twins are suppose to be both gay? of course that's wrong but it sounds like that's what you're saying.
And there are pollutants that can fuck up your system and make you weaker mentally, physically, and then perhaps nature puts you over to the gay side because you are too weak and should not reproduce. perhaps you can contribute to society in other ways than passing on your genes, and nature means for that to be your destiny.

[King of the world]

I'd like to see your statistics on the amount of kike fags though, because it ironically sounds like you pulled that out of your ass. It seems that "white nationalists" call jews physically and mentally weaker, yet you seem to think that on the other hand they have no problem outsmarting and dominating other groups, other white people in particular (jew are "white", whether you and your white nationalist definition of "white" likes it or not).

There's actually some evidence that the diseases Ashkenazi jews carry are possibly partly responsible for their high IQs. The other accompanying explanation being how long they've had to live by their wits due to persecution. (http://web.mit.edu/hst.508/www/Ashkenazi.pdf)

[King of the world]

Maybe this thread would be better in The Inhumane Condition, it'd be likely to get a slightly better audience and replies from them, all you're going to get in here are degenerates putting in their "2 cents" when no one really gives a shit about their vapid, leftist opinions.

[testerman]

I'd like to see your statistics on the amount of kike fags though, because it ironically sounds like you pulled that out of your ass. It seems that "white nationalists" call jews physically and mentally weaker, yet you seem to think that on the other hand they have no problem outsmarting and dominating other groups, other white people in particular (jew are "white", whether you and your white nationalist definition of "white" likes it or not).

There's actually some evidence that the diseases Ashkenazi jews carry are possibly partly responsible for their high IQs. The other accompanying explanation being how long they've had to live by their wits due to persecution. (http://web.mit.edu/hst.508/www/Ashkenazi.pdf)

"persecution" - that's debatable whether it's persecution or it's just other nations trying to protect themselves frmo the jews.
I don't have stats on kike faggotry. I only go from what I see among public kikes, who seem to have a high prevalence of faggotry. Also note how jewish Liberalism barely has any issue left of their own other than supporting faggot rights. jews LOVE faggots, even more than niggers. Certainly there are many reasons, but I think one such reason is that they are so faggy themselves that they can relate to fags more than they can relate to normal people.

[testerman]

Politicians

Roberta Achtenberg, former HUD assistant secretary[1]
David Cicilline, the Mayor of Providence, Rhode Island became a member of the United States House of Representatives in 2011.
Barney Frank, Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives [2]
Marcia Freedman, former member of the Israeli Knesset[3]
Nitzan Horowitz, Israeli Member of Knesset, first openly gay person to be elected to the Knesset.
Rebecca Kaplan, City Councilmember At-Large, Oakland, California[4]
Anne Kronenberg, American political administrator[5]
Mark Leno, California State Assemblymember[6]
Carole Migden, former California State Senator;[7] seat now occupied by Mark Leno
Harvey Milk, former San Francisco city supervisor [8]
Jared Polis, the Colorado Democrat, a former Internet entrepreneur, became the first openly gay non-incumbent male elected to Congress[9][10]
Stan Rosenberg, President Pro Tempore, Massachusetts State Senate[citation needed]
[edit]Religious figures

Lionel Blue, first openly gay rabbi in the UK; broadcaster[11]
Steven Greenberg,[12] first out Orthodox rabbi and staff member of CLAL.[citation needed]
Denise Eger, first female and the first gay President of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California.[citation needed]
Sherwin Wine, rabbi and founding figure in Humanistic Judaism.[citation needed]
[edit]Academics

Allan Bloom, philosopher[13]
Judith Butler, philosopher[14]
Blanche Wiesen Cook, historian and author.[citation needed]
Martin Duberman, historian[15]
Uzi Even, Israeli chemist and former Knesset member[16]
Magnus Hirschfeld, sexologist and activist[17]
Ron Huberman, Israeli-born CEO of Chicago Public Schools[18]
Fritz Klein, psychiatrist and sexologist[19]
George Mosse, historian[20]
Ludwig Wittgenstein, philosopher[21]
[edit]Show business

Chantal Akerman, film director[22]
Simon Amstell, comedian and television presenter[23]
Michael Bennett, choreographer and musical theatre director[24][25]
Sandra Bernhard, actress and comedian[26]
Sarah Bernhardt, world-famous stage actress[27]
Ilene Chaiken, creator of The L Word[28]
George Cukor, film director[29]
Harvey Fierstein, actor and playwright[30]
Stephen Fry, actor, comedian and writer[31]
Judy Gold, stand-up comedian and actress[32]
Julie Goldman, stand-up comedian[citation needed]
Todd Haynes, film director[33]
Nicholas Hytner, theatre and film director[34]
Moisés Kaufman, award-winning Venezuelan-born playwright/director long resident in the U.S.[citation needed]
Jerome Robbins, choreographer and musical theatre director[35]
John Schlesinger, film director[36]
Anthony Sher, actor[37]
Bryan Singer, film director[38]
Mauritz Stiller, film director[39]
Bruce Vilanch, comedy writer and actor[40]
[edit]Musicians, Composers, Lyricists, Vocalists

Howard Ashman, musical writer[41]
Babydaddy, member of Scissor Sisters[42]
Frieda Belinfante, conductor (Jewish father)[43]
Leonard Bernstein, composer and conductor[44]
Marc Blitzstein, composer[45]
Carrie Brownstein, guitarist in Sleater-Kinney[46]
Aaron Copland, composer[47]
Fred Ebb, musical theatre lyricist[48]
Michael Feinstein, singer and pianist[49][50]
William Finn, musical theatre composer, lyricist and librettist[51]
Ari Gold, pop singer[52]
Lesley Gore, pop singer[53]
Howard Greenfield, composer ("Love Will Keep Us Together", TV theme song from "Bewitched")[citation needed]
Lorenz Hart, lyricist[54]
Jerry Herman, musical theatre composer and lyricist [55]
Vladimir Horowitz, classical pianist[56]
Janis Ian (born Janis Eddy Fink), American songwriter, singer, musician, columnist, and science fiction author.[57]
Dave Koz (born David Kozlowski), jazz saxophonist [58]
Adam Lambert, singer and runner-up on the 8th season of American Idol[59][60]
Jon Moss, drummer, member of Culture Club and The Damned[61]
Laura Nyro, singer-songwriter[62][63]
Peaches, Canadian electro-punk musician and performance artist[64]
Phranc, singer-songwriter[65]
Marc Shaiman, musical theatre and film composer[66][67]
Julie Silver, singer-songwriter[68]
Socalled, rapper[69]
Stephen Sondheim, musical theatre composer and lyricist[70][71]
Alicia Svigals, composer, violinist and a founder and former member of The Kelzmatics[citation needed]
Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor, composer, and pianist[72]
[edit]Writers

Leroy F. Aarons, journalist/editor/author/playwright and activist founder of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA)[citation needed]
Jon Robin Baitz, playwright and screenwriter[73]
Steve Berman, speculative fiction writer[74]
Jane Bowles, novelist and playwright[75]
Alfred Chester, novelist[76]
Nick Denton, founder of Gawker Media (Jewish mother)[77]
György Faludy, poet[78]
Edward Field, poet[79]
Sanford Friedman, novelist[80]
Allen Ginsberg, US Beat generation poet[81][82]
Richard Greenberg, playwright[83]
Jacob Israël de Haan, poet[84]
Marilyn Hacker, poet[85]
Aaron Hamburger, novelist[86]
Max Jacob, poet[87]
Chester Kallman, poet and librettist[88]
Arthur Laurents, playwright, screenwriter and librettist[citation needed]
David Leavitt, novelist and short-story writer[89]
Leo Lerman, writer/editor [90][91]
Michael Lowenthal, novelist[92]
Herbert Muschamp [93] (1947–2007) , New York Times architecture critic
Harold Norse, poet[94]
Marcel Proust, novelist (Jewish mother)[95]
David Rakoff, essayist[96]
Paul Rudnick, playwright, screenwriter and columnist[97]
Umberto Saba, poet and novelist[98]
Siegfried Sassoon, poet (Jewish father)[99]
Martin Sherman, playwright[100]
Susan Sontag, essayist and novelist[101][102]
Gertrude Stein, writer[103]
Julian Stryjkowski, novelist[104]
[edit]Artists and Architects

Aaron Betsky, architect/critic/author, formerly directed the Netherlands Architecture Institute and presently directs the Cincinnati Art Museum[citation needed]
Claude Cahun, French photographer and writer[105]
Robert Denning, American interior designer, from the age of 15 was the partner of Edgar de Evia, photographer and from 1960 both life and business partner of Vincent Fourcade, French interior designer.[106]
Nan Goldin, photographer[107]
Herbert List, photographer[108]
Maurice Sendak, illustrator and author of children's books as well as costume and set designer for films, theater and opera[citation needed]
Simeon Solomon, painter[109]
[edit]Fashion Designers

Isaac Mizrahi (1961 - ) American fashion designer[110]
Arnold Scaasi (1930-)[citation needed]
[edit]Sports figures

Robert Dover, 6-time Olympic equestrianist[111]
Renée Richards, tennis player[112]
[edit]Miscellaneous

Stuart Appelbaum, president of both the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union and the Jewish Labor Committee
Gad Beck, Holocaust survivor and memoirist[113]
Roy Cohn, lawyer and co-counsel—along with Robert F. Kennedy--to Sen. Joseph McCarthy[114]
Barry Diller, media executive[115][116]
Sandi Simcha DuBowski, documentary filmmaker.[citation needed]
Brian Epstein, manager of The Beatles[117]
David Geffen, film producer and record executive[118]
Mitchell Gold, furniture company CEO and gay rights activist[119][120]
Leopold and Loeb, murderers[121]
Michael Lucas, gay porn star[122]
Ezra Nawi, Israeli human rights activist[123]
Richard Quest, television journalist[124]
Randi Weingarten, current president of the American Federation of Teachers[125]
[edit]Fictional characters

See also: List of fictitious Jews
[edit]See also

Keshet Rabbis
Homosexuality and Judaism
List of bisexual people
List of gay, lesbian, or bisexual figures in fiction and myth
List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people
List of transgendered people
Timeline of LGBT history

[testerman]

considering they're only 2% of the population and these are just the known prominent ones, that's a lot.

[King of the world]

Here's where we come back to jewish conspiracies (which I myself used to believe when I first became interested in racial topics and politics years ago). Liberals LOVE faggots, liberal jews love faggots, non-liberal jews tend not to. I use the term liberal in the way that fascists see it, as in most "conservatives" are just "classic liberals" too. I don't take left and right, I'm third position and have a strong opposition to everything that is liberal. I'm against liberal jews and fags as much as you are, but it is not a "jew" problem.

I take it you read a lot of Kevin MacDonald, am I right?
We should leave this for another thread, we're getting off topic now.

On topic:
http://heretical.com/toa/toa-s03x.html
Here's another explanation of homosexuality. Also coming back to your OP, yes the average homosexual displays huge mental problems on average and could be considered as mentally weak. I don't see it as entirely "natures" way of cutting out those "unfit" to reproduce.

[testerman]

Here's where we come back to jewish conspiracies (which I myself used to believe when I became interested in racial topics and politics). Liberals LOVE faggots, liberal jews love faggots, non-liberal jews tend not to. I use the term liberal in the way that fascists see it, as in most "conservatives" are just "classic liberals" too. I don't take left and right, I'm third position and have a strong opposition to everything that is liberal. I'm against liberal jews and fags as much as you are, but it is not a "jew" problem.

I take it you read a lot of Kevin MacDonald, am I right?
We should leave this for another thread, we're getting off topic now.

On topic:
http://heretical.com/toa/toa-s03x.html
Here's another explanation of homosexuality. Also coming back to your OP, yes the average homosexual displays huge mental problems on average and could be considered as mentally weak. I don't see it as entirely "natures" way of cutting out those "unfit" to reproduce.

There is such a thing as white liberalism (with no jews in the mix), but jews use their money and power and downright evil nature to draw whites to the liberal side, to make it a white thing. but with no jews, I believe liberals are a very fringe thing.

Like i was saying, I cannot prove my hypothesis. There are no theories of fags which are proven. Everyone has their own opinion like everyone has an asshole. But I an proposing this as a way to view it which i can't prove, but it works for me over time, so i am proposing it as a truth.

[33% God]

Well it cetainly hasn't stopped the stupid inbred rednecklike people from around the world to reproduce now, has it?

I'm sure just about every redneck could beat my ass. Rednecks are retarded on a social level, but when it comes to survival and fighting, they sure win, therefore, not weak.

[testerman]

Go fuck off !! I have best friends that are negro and mexcian, STFU about people sexuality, people have been having sex in every way possible since the dawn of time! BTW I am straight so enough of the gay jokes.

faggot

[King of the world]

Go fuck off !! I have best friends that are negro and mexcian, STFU about people sexuality, people have been having sex in every way possible since the dawn of time! BTW I am straight so enough of the gay jokes.

I guess I'll be the first to say it; NO ONE GIVES A FUCK.

[^]

Depression and mental illness are natures way of preventing the weak from breeding. What you said is extremely stupid on many levels OP. considering how homosexuality is in no way inherited, you fucking moron.

[Star Wars Fan]

:picard: at this very thread

[Struwwelpeter]

homosexuals definitely are not weak. they defend their territory from niggers, mexicans, the police, white hate groups, etc. they are in fact quite militant. and don't even get me started about the homosexual mafia

[Struwwelpeter]

homosexuals could reproduce. i see no reason why they could not come up with a system where they go out and kidnap women and inseminate them for the purposes of increasing their population. and because the percentage of homosexuals in society is fairly low they can always recruit kids from the heterosexual population. furthermore, homosexuals are technically superior to heterosexuals. consider this, the fashion and pop media industry to which all females subscribe is controlled by homosexuals. homosexuals decide what young american girls wear, what they listen to, etc. homosexuals have more control over the young children of heterosexual parents than the parents themselves. until these weak ass parents start beating and raping their daughters and force them to get married and have children at 13 years old and keep them locked up in the house this will always be the case. there can be no television in the household either since it's influence on young girls is so pervasive.

[yawanur]

homosexuals could reproduce. i see no reason why they could not come up with a system where they go out and kidnap women and inseminate them for the purposes of increasing their population. and because the percentage of homosexuals in society is fairly low they can always recruit kids from the heterosexual population. furthermore, homosexuals are technically superior to heterosexuals. consider this, the fashion and pop media industry to which all females subscribe is controlled by homosexuals. homosexuals decide what young american girls wear, what they listen to, etc. homosexuals have more control over the young children of heterosexual parents than the parents themselves. until these weak ass parents start beating and raping their daughters and force them to get married and have children at 13 years old and keep them locked up in the house this will always be the case. there can be no television in the household either since it's influence on young girls is so pervasive.

I always think I have you figured out and then BOOM!

[King of the world]

homosexuals could reproduce. i see no reason why they could not come up with a system where they go out and kidnap women and inseminate them for the purposes of increasing their population. and because the percentage of homosexuals in society is fairly low they can always recruit kids from the heterosexual population. furthermore, homosexuals are technically superior to heterosexuals. consider this, the fashion and pop media industry to which all females subscribe is controlled by homosexuals. homosexuals decide what young american girls wear, what they listen to, etc. homosexuals have more control over the young children of heterosexual parents than the parents themselves. until these weak ass parents start beating and raping their daughters and force them to get married and have children at 13 years old and keep them locked up in the house this will always be the case. there can be no television in the household either since it's influence on young girls is so pervasive.

There was a study done in the 70s (IIRC) that showed homosexuals to have a higher IQ than heterosexuals, but consider the politics surrounding homosexuality around that time and the fact that not many other studies (to my knowledge) have been done on homosexual-heterosexual g factor. Like I said earlier, they're certainly not all weak, they're just disgusting and degenerate.

[testerman]

homosexuals definitely are not weak. they defend their territory from niggers, mexicans, the police, white hate groups, etc. they are in fact quite militant. and don't even get me started about the homosexual mafia
I define strength by how good a people are at building civilization. faggots not only do not build it, they tear it down. same with jews. thus those people are VERY WEAK.

[^]

I define strength by how good a people are at building civilization. faggots not only do not build it, they tear it down. same with jews. thus those people are VERY WEAK.

You're an idiot and know nothing about everything.

[testerman]

You're an idiot and know nothing about everything.

you just gave the classic argument of an idiot.