Verdict: MLK killed by US Gov. to prevent revolution, wealth redistribution

[nshanin]

Now, he began to talk about a redistribution of wealth, in this the wealthiest country in the world that had such a large group of poor people, of people living then and now, in poverty.

That problem had to be addressed. And it wasn’t a black-and-white problem. This was a problem that dealt with Hispanics, and it dealt with poor whites as well. That is what he was taking on. That’s what he was challenging.

They were afraid that a mob would overrun the capital. They were afraid of what Mr. Jefferson had urged many, many times, that the body politic can only be cleansed by a revolution every twenty years.

They were afraid that Mr. Jefferson would be listened to and that that revolution would take place. Because of that, those factors, Martin King was not going to be allowed, not going to be allowed to bring that group of people to Washington.
--From the transcript of the civil case

http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/1630/245/Dr._King_family_s_civil_trial_verdict:_US_governme nt_assassinated_Martin.html?currentSplittedPage=0

Surprise, surprise--no textbook will go near the truth.

[Tachosomoza]

Yeah, before he was killed he was going to move his activism from strictly civil rights for oppressed blacks to a broader anti-war, anti-exploitation agenda. The suits in Washington sealed his fate when he started speaking out against the war in Vietnam, and started addressing poor people in general. As long as he was able to be painted as a "Negro agitator", they were fine. When he started to appeal to poor whites, Native Americans, immigrants and Latinos, it was murder time.