View Full Version : Why black people are the way they are?
whocares
04-29-2012, 03:43 AM
I think I've figured it out:
1. Most of them are fat.
Most likely it's because of the image in Africa where everybody is starving. They don't like the image being portrayed with starvation and dehydration, so they eat up as much food as they can, just so they can change the stereotype. They don't want to live through the same experiences their ancestors did and still do. Being fat is a way for them to say, "Nuh uh, we ain't starvin' broke motherfuckers."
2. Most of them want to be rich.
Most likely it's because of the economic problems in Africa, and the history behind slavery. Africa is very poor, and that makes most Africa-Americans want to disconnect themselves from this stereotype. Not only were black people slaves in the past, they had very little fortune to pass on to their children. When they were sold off to slave masters. This is a multi-century image that has plagued black history. I think that's why being rich is a way for them to display their insatiable desire for ambition, because they came from the bottom. Also, there's a lot of anger built in caused by the slave trade injustices, so it makes sense that the American Dream is how they redeem themselves.
3. Most of them have hoes.
Most likely it's because of their big dicks and muscular bodies, bred by slave masters in the past. That's probably why black chicks have big butts, cuz they only bred the thickest, strongest slaves. Also, because many slave families were separated at birth, it creates a massive disconnection in genealogy, even seen today. We see the results, black kids often don't have their fathers around, because their father's father wasn't there, most likely due to slavery origin and/or due to financial difficulties. It's also a way for them to celebrate, as most of Africa is infected with HIV/AIDS. They want to show that you can bang hoes, and still be HIV free.
4. Most of them are into drugs.
Most likely it's due to emotional duress passed onto them from generations. When slaves were separated at birth, it destroyed the 'nurture' aspect of the children, and it affected the entire family tree. A person is affected by its environment, at the beginning when it's a fetus. So when you're a pregnant slave working all day and night, your baby is going to feel the stress. If someone is a slave, it's very likely that he won't be able to support his children. It's going to leave a bad taste. I think we still see a small scale of this as most African-Americans have trouble supporting their children in low income housing. And what better way to deal with those emotions with drugs.
SoulButter
04-29-2012, 03:46 AM
It's cuz they niggers.
sexually vulnerable CPR dummy
04-29-2012, 03:59 AM
I say we have a 5 page discussion about this. It's the only logical way.
Struwwelpeter
04-29-2012, 04:06 AM
I think I've figured it out:
1. Most of them are fat.
Most likely it's because of the image in Africa where everybody is starving. They don't like the image being portrayed with starvation and dehydration, so they eat up as much food as they can, just so they can change the stereotype. They don't want to live through the same experiences their ancestors did and still do. Being fat is a way for them to say, "Nuh uh, we ain't starvin' broke motherfuckers."
Black people are fat because they a.) do not exercise and b.) are genetically predisposed towards fat storage. Their higher estrogen levels and lower pituitary output causes them to store excess fat. In addition to this, the African-American diet is high in calories, particularly in fat and carbohydrates.
2. Most of them want to be rich.
Most likely it's because of the economic problems in Africa, and the history behind slavery. Africa is very poor, and that makes most Africa-Americans want to disconnect themselves from this stereotype. Not only were black people slaves in the past, they had very little fortune to pass on to their children. When they were sold off to slave masters. This is a multi-century image that has plagued black history. I think that's why being rich is a way for them to display their insatiable desire for ambition, because they came from the bottom. Also, there's a lot of anger built in caused by the slave trade injustices, so it makes sense that the American Dream is how they redeem themselves.
Most everybody wants to be rich.
3. Most of them have hoes.
Most likely it's because of their big dicks and muscular bodies, bred by slave masters in the past. That's probably why black chicks have big butts, cuz they only bred the thickest, strongest slaves. Also, because many slave families were separated at birth, it creates a massive disconnection in genealogy, even seen today. We see the results, black kids often don't have their fathers around, because their father's father wasn't there, most likely due to slavery origin and/or due to financial difficulties. It's also a way for them to celebrate, as most of Africa is infected with HIV/AIDS. They want to show that you can bang hoes, and still be HIV free.
Blacks do not have big dicks or muscular bodies. Perhaps you should see the first point you made about African-American obesity levels. Slaves were not bread for muscularity or physical strength; in reality they were not bred for any physical characteristic seeing as this was the 18th/19th century and not exactly the pinnacle of understanding of genetics or physiology. One does not need muscles to do a little agricultural work as the slaves did, and even so there were no "muscular" people prior to the advent of modern pharmaceuticals and training programs. Here is a photo of what a typical black slaved would have looked like; as you can see he is of poor physique:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Cicatrices_de_flagellation_sur_un_esclave.jpg/220px-Cicatrices_de_flagellation_sur_un_esclave.jpg
Additionally, black females do not have "big butts."
4. Most of them are into drugs.
Most likely it's due to emotional duress passed onto them from generations. When slaves were separated at birth, it destroyed the 'nurture' aspect of the children, and it affected the entire family tree. A person is affected by its environment, at the beginning when it's a fetus. So when you're a pregnant slave working all day and night, your baby is going to feel the stress. If someone is a slave, it's very likely that he won't be able to support his children. It's going to leave a bad taste. I think we still see a small scale of this as most African-Americans have trouble supporting their children in low income housing. And what better way to deal with those emotions with drugs.
Most people are in to drugs, regardless of racial or ethnic background.
i know plenty of blacks that don't fit those attributer and plenty of whites that do... is this even important? it just comes off as ignorant
is all mememememe with me
04-29-2012, 04:48 AM
fred sucks jew balls
whocares
04-30-2012, 05:46 AM
Black people are fat because they a.) do not exercise and b.) are genetically predisposed towards fat storage. Their higher estrogen levels and lower pituitary output causes them to store excess fat. In addition to this, the African-American diet is high in calories, particularly in fat and carbohydrates.
Also, another factor is maybe because why they like KFC so much for a good reason--because it feeds the whole family and it's cheap. I think that's why they also like Watermelons, because it's huge and also cheap.
Most everybody wants to be rich.
The meaning of "broke niggas" has a big affect on broke niggas.
Blacks do not have big dicks or muscular bodies. Perhaps you should see the first point you made about African-American obesity levels. Slaves were not bread for muscularity or physical strength; in reality they were not bred for any physical characteristic seeing as this was the 18th/19th century and not exactly the pinnacle of understanding of genetics or physiology. One does not need muscles to do a little agricultural work as the slaves did, and even so there were no "muscular" people prior to the advent of modern pharmaceuticals and training programs. Here is a photo of what a typical black slaved would have looked like; as you can see he is of poor physique:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Cicatrices_de_flagellation_sur_un_esclave.jpg/220px-Cicatrices_de_flagellation_sur_un_esclave.jpg
Additionally, black females do not have "big butts."
Because their ancestors were slaves, I think their children got stronger and stronger down the line. Why do you think most of NFL and NBA is black?
Most people are in to drugs, regardless of racial or ethnic background.
Why are most drug dealers black then?
Morticia
04-30-2012, 05:52 AM
Because the melanin poisons their brains, man! They develop differently than the aryan master race and all the energy goes into making their dick bigger and not their brain.
EDIT: aww man allcaps doesn't work :(
The Pat-Man
04-30-2012, 05:52 AM
black females do have big butts tho, cant deny that shit.
Struwwelpeter
04-30-2012, 05:57 AM
NBA/NFL = steroids, proteins, peptides, stimulants, hormones, elasticity compounds, growth factors, etc. It's not a reflection of genetics seeing as all of the players have voided their genetic compositions and replaced them with ergogenic aids.
Race participation in sports has more to do with cultural interest than genetics (the value of which is wholly overstated). But insofar as strength are concerned, Caucasoids and Australoids are the strongest races.
I don't think that most drug dealers are Black, nor do I really think that it would have anything to do with the rest of the world's dabbling in drugs.
Struwwelpeter
04-30-2012, 06:10 AM
black females do have big butts tho, cant deny that shit.
Black females have the smallest behinds of all races.
The largest are found on Caucasoid females of the Orientalid, Armenid, Kaukasid and Irano Afghan/Corded Nordic varieties.
Any depictions of large-assed Negroid females in the media are typically racially mixed females who have received plastic surgery enhancement (liposuction of the stomach, injections of silicone, cement or bacteriostatic imitation cottage cheese in to the ass, surgical debridement of the lateral torso, etc) in order to improve their image.
The "large assed female" concept arose from Neolthic (Caucasoid) societies some tens of thousands of years ago. See following sculpture:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MotherGoddessFertility.JPG
The Pat-Man
04-30-2012, 06:11 AM
in my real life personal experiences, black chicks have large posteriors.
gadzooks
04-30-2012, 06:21 AM
Blacks do not have big dicks or muscular bodies. Perhaps you should see the first point you made about African-American obesity levels. Slaves were not bread for muscularity or physical strength; in reality they were not bred for any physical characteristic seeing as this was the 18th/19th century and not exactly the pinnacle of understanding of genetics or physiology.
I had to chime in because of this...
Animal husbandry is a millenia old practice. It predates the science of genetics by thousands of years. Gregor Mendel didn't come along until the late 19th century.
If they wanted big asses, they'd have totally known how to produce more of them via selective breeding.
Struwwelpeter
04-30-2012, 06:28 AM
Check it out guys, knife-making is a 500,000 year old practice.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Canto_tallado_2-Guelmim-Es_Semara.jpg
The redneck slave owners could not have and would not have bred their slaves for large asses. They could care less about the physiological well-being of the common slave.
gadzooks
04-30-2012, 06:31 AM
Check it out guys, knife-making is a 500,000 year old practice.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Canto_tallado_2-Guelmim-Es_Semara.jpg
The redneck slave owners could not have and would not have bred their slaves for large asses. They could care less about the physiological well-being of the common slave.
I was just pointing out that they could have bred certain characteristics because they had a basic understanding of how to do so. I was not making a comment on whether or not they actually would. That's an entirely different debate that I don't think I'd even want to get into.
The Pat-Man
04-30-2012, 06:32 AM
dont think id want a bunch of buff ass slaves running around
Struwwelpeter
04-30-2012, 06:33 AM
I was just pointing out that they could have bred certain characteristics because they had a basic understanding of how to do so. I was not making a comment on whether or not they actually would. That's an entirely different debate that I don't think I'd even want to get into.
Yes but they could not have selectively bred Negroids for large asses, either.
gadzooks
04-30-2012, 06:35 AM
Yes but they could not have selectively bred Negroids for large asses, either.
What? Why not? If they took all the slaves with the biggest asses and put them together, eventually they'd have preferentially selected for larger asses in their mating pools. Even if it only took place slowly and subtly, it still could have taken place.
Struwwelpeter
04-30-2012, 06:50 AM
That's not true at all. Large-assed women produce intelligent small-assed children. Excessive amounts of fat stored around that part of the body is consumed by the fetus and results in increased brain development. All of this information is recorded in the child's RNA and expressed in a nootropic protein. The child is born with a large brain and a small ass, similar to a Mongoloid. This child (if female only) is born with wider hips, and these hips continue to grow wider in to adulthood in order to facilitate the birth of another large-brained child. The widening of the hips spreads the muscle and the fat out over a larger surface area which results in a less prolific ass profile. It will then take several more generations of breeding to produce another large-assed female.
So the "large ass" is not something that can be easily "selected." It isn't like hair texture or hair color. It is something that comes about by pure chance. When you also take in to account the fact that large asses are especially rare (especially in non-industrial societies) and also subject to environmental conditions like nutrition and lifestyle it becomes even more apparent that it is difficult if not impossible to selectively breed them.
gadzooks
04-30-2012, 07:02 AM
That's not true at all. Large-assed women produce intelligent small-assed children. Excessive amounts of fat stored around that part of the body is consumed by the fetus and results in increased brain development. All of this information is recorded in the child's RNA and expressed in a nootropic protein. The child is born with a large brain and a small ass, similar to a Mongoloid. This child (if female only) is born with wider hips, and these hips continue to grow wider in to adulthood in order to facilitate the birth of another large-brained child. The widening of the hips spreads the muscle and the fat out over a larger surface area which results in a less prolific ass profile. It will then take several more generations of breeding to produce another large-assed female.
So the "large ass" is not something that can be easily "selected." It isn't like hair texture or hair color. It is something that comes about by pure chance. When you also take in to account the fact that large asses are especially rare (especially in non-industrial societies) and also subject to environmental conditions like nutrition and lifestyle it becomes even more apparent that it is difficult if not impossible to selectively breed them.
Do you happen to have any sources to support any of that? I'm not trying to claim outright that you're wrong. You may be right. My whole point was that it seems within the realm of possibility that they could have bred large asses.
I am still a bit skeptical though about ass size being so difficult to selectively breed. I understand the theoretical connection between brain size and hip size, but it doesn't seem like such an easily explicable connection.
sexually vulnerable CPR dummy
04-30-2012, 02:58 PM
http://www.fistofblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/mime-attachment.jpeg
GADONKA DONK
Tachosomoza
04-30-2012, 03:03 PM
Obligatory. :o
Bruce Hornsby and the Range - The Way It Is - YouTube
Poor people in first world countries are fat because the food available to them is unhealthier, they want to be rich because they were violently locked out of wealth for so long. In the South if a poor black dude tried to get property, he'd find himself ran out of town, his animals stolen, or his crop destroyed, and he might even find himself lynched. The white supremacist status quo in the South depended on the presence of a large underclass of blacks, racists openly admitted to it, because they feared a rebellion and massive pogrom of whites if blacks, who outnumbered whites 5 to 1 in many places, were allowed to gain economic control.
Ambient
04-30-2012, 03:17 PM
That's not true at all. Large-assed women produce intelligent small-assed children.
This guy, LOL.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.