Obama

[Acedia]

So, I realize that most of the users on this website are not pro-bama. I think it's bullshit though that most of them do not like him for the simple fact that he's a "fucking nigger". I've done enough ranting and raving about racism in the past 24 hours though, so that's not what this is about.

I would really like to here some legitimate reasons why this guy is so bad, and not just the usual bullshit responses on race, gun control, and "omfg hez a socialist."

Personally, I like the guy, I just don't like how people have been propping him up to be some kind of Messiah or something.

Discuss.

[Venatio Vos]

Barrack received only 69,456,897 votes to John McCains 59,934,786. But in electoral votes it was 365 to 173.

Proving once again, that the votes and opinions of the American people mean nothing.

[unstableasatable]

yh, dont get why people should come out to vote just cos hes half black. people should vote on what people do not who they are

[Acedia]

I agree that our current system of electing the president is kind of screwy, it really should be decided by popular vote, not the electoral college.

In either case, McCain still loses. 10 million people's opinions apparently matter quite a bit.

[Acedia]

yh, dont get why people should come out to vote just cos hes half black. people should vote on what people do not who they are

I agree. I'm sure a majority of the people who voted for him did in fact vote just because he was the first black guy to get that far into a campaign. Probably most of the young voters, the people I mentioned before, who like to prop him up into something he's not.

[Valkyr]

if theres one thing america needs right now its some socialism. Ever seen micheal moores sicko. Well that cant happen in a socialist country.

[Angry Blue Bird of Death]

I don't have him because he's black, I hate him because he's a puppet of the Zionists that run the country.

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/874/obamaisraelgj0.jpg

[Acedia]

I really have no quells with socialism, I think it could do this country some good.

[Acedia]

I don't have him because he's black, I hate him because he's a puppet of the Zionists that run the country.

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/874/obamaisraelgj0.jpg

And.. how exactly is that legitimate?

[ILTST9]

I really have no quells with socialism, I think it could do this country some good.

Yeah, stealing from the people who've done something to earn their money and giving it to crack smoking niggers is going to do this country a lot of good. :rolleyes:

[Acedia]

I guess it all depends on your perspective.

[Angry Blue Bird of Death]

And.. how exactly is that legitimate?

How is it not legitimate?
It's very clear that Zionists are the ones making the real decisions.

Let me guess you're one of those people who want to spark a debate but try to discredit others with opposing views. Nice :mad:

[Acedia]

How is it not legitimate?
It's very clear that Zionists are the ones making the real decisions.

Let me guess you're one of those people who want to spark a debate but try to discredit others with opposing views. Nice :mad:

I'm not discrediting you, and if it seemed like I did, I apologize. I just think that idea sounds a little far fetched to me.

[err0r]

So, I realize that most of the users on this website are not pro-bama. I think it's bullshit though that most of them do not like him for the simple fact that he's a "fucking nigger". I've done enough ranting and raving about racism in the past 24 hours though, so that's not what this is about.

I would really like to here some legitimate reasons why this guy is so bad, and not just the usual bullshit responses on race, gun control, and "omfg hez a socialist."

Personally, I like the guy, I just don't like how people have been propping him up to be some kind of Messiah or something.

Discuss.

I like Obama.

Fucking republicans...fucking old bat McCain would probably die of old age within his first few weeks in office. (For anyone trying to be clever, no these are not my real reasons nor the only ones for supporting Obama). :mad:

[Acedia]

Well that makes two of us.


P.S. That was my number one reason for not liking McCain. Far too old.

[lostmyface]

Barrack received only 69,456,897 votes to John McCains 59,934,786. But in electoral votes it was 365 to 173.

Proving once again, that the votes and opinions of the American people mean nothing.

i dont get your argument. the majority of Americans voted for obama, an now obama is the president. looks like the system worked out just fine.

[LSA King]

Barrack received only 69,456,897 votes to John McCains 59,934,786. But in electoral votes it was 365 to 173.

Proving once again, that the votes and opinions of the American people mean nothing.



But yet they did he wont by almost 10 million. Its shitty and I am not pro-Obama and you are right about the electoral vote bullshit about only a few states needing to select one canidate for him to win.

[Nitronick]

Anyone that says hes shit is a fucking dick head. He hasn't even done anything yet for fuck sake.

[LSA King]

Anyone that says hes shit is a fucking dick head. He hasn't even done anything yet for fuck sake.


Thats part of the point. People thought he was some sort of new age jesus with his fancy ideas. Everyone has ideas many great some just personal. Until I see the shit he claims he is on the shitlist, this isn't the courts where you are innocent until proven guilty, you are a shitbag until you prove yourself squared away.

[Nitronick]

Thats part of the point. People thought he was some sort of new age jesus with his fancy ideas. Everyone has ideas many great some just personal. Until I see the shit he claims he is on the shitlist, this isn't the courts where you are innocent until proven guilty, you are a shitbag until you prove yourself squared away.

A mentality I can agree with.

[be quiet, fridge]

He is mint.

[Firemite]

I asked one of his supporters what his policies were.

All they could think of was "he's bringing big changes". No information on WHAT these changes are. :angry:

Also, try taking one of the "yes we can!" chants and slowing it down. It sounds like something from a cult :)

[ArmsMerchant]

I agree that our current system of electing the president is kind of screwy, it really should be decided by popular vote, not the electoral college.

In either case, McCain still loses. 10 million people's opinions apparently matter quite a bit.

Agreed. And don't forget, in 2000 Gore got more votes than the Shrub--in fact, Gore got more votes than ANYONE else ever got for prez.

I voted for Obama because he is intelligent, hard-working, compassionate, progressive, honest and NOT BUSH.

[Acedia]

Agreed. And don't forget, in 2000 Gore got more votes than the Shrub--in fact, Gore got more votes than ANYONE else ever got for prez.

I voted for Obama because he is intelligent, hard-working, compassionate, progressive, honest and NOT BUSH.

You're really the last person I expected to hear this from! :bluerazz:

Btw, I'm down for that Shamanism discussion when ever you're interested.

[Pringles]

I didn't like Obama because of his opinion on guns. Like semi auto's. He wants to stop the sale and transfer of them.
here are some sources
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080419/pl_politico/9722
http://www.gunlawnews.org/Senators/Barack-Obama.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/11/obama.gun.sales/
http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm
you can also just google obama gun laws.
McCain and Obama both sucked.
and Obama is only half a nigger.

[coronaria]

It is nice to finally have a president that is smarter than I am for a change. As far as McCain, I would have voted for Howard the Duck if thats what it took to keep Caribou Barbie the fuck out of the White House.

[fux0rz]

It is nice to finally have a president that is smarter than I am for a change. As far as McCain, I would have voted for Howard the Duck if thats what it took to keep Caribou Barbie the fuck out of the White House.

Amen to that

[Dark Destroyer]

i hate him for the simple fact that niggers love him cuz hes black.
HES NOT BLACK. and fuck all u niggers who say he is

[Roll Fizzlebeef]

Pay Attention Children

http://i41.tinypic.com/1dymon.jpg

[dammitjim]

[QUOTE=Venatio Vos;29915]Barrack received only 69,456,897 votes to John McCains 59,934,786. But in electoral votes it was 365 to 173.

Already on a first-name basis with the pres.....damn.:bluecool:

[dammitjim]

i hate him for the simple fact that niggers love him cuz hes black.
HES NOT BLACK. and fuck all u niggers who say he is

You mean he's NOT WHITE?!!

I thought he was a skinny jehovas witness that fell asleep in a tanning booth and has upside-down ears.....


You sure he ain't white.....?

[Angry Blue Bird of Death]

Pay Attention Children

http://i41.tinypic.com/1dymon.jpg

There's no difference, blacks are inferior to whites.

[Roll Fizzlebeef]

There's no difference, blacks are inferior to whites.

and whites are Inferior to Asians.

Now to find a race that's above Asians....

[Frank&Sense]

I like Obama.

Fucking republicans...fucking old bat McCain would probably die of old age within his first few weeks in office. (For anyone trying to be clever, no these are not my real reasons nor the only ones for supporting Obama). :mad:
You are the reason I don't support Obama. (well that and i don't like his policies, cuz, I, unlike you do my research.) You talk all this shit about McCain and Bush, yet you can't seem to give any real reasons. If you actually do have real reasons, SHARE THEM IN YOUR FIRST FUCKING POST DICKWEED. Don't just say some gay bullshit reason then say it wasn't your "real" reason. You're just fucking stupid.

[Angry Blue Bird of Death]

and whites are Inferior to Asians.

Now to find a race that's above Asians....

No they're not

[LSA King]

and whites are Inferior to Asians.

Now to find a race that's above Asians....




Your fucking retarded. When the jews are parished from the white mas world the niggers and spics are first and asians wont be far behind. They are only a good alliance for the white man until he is finished then we throw them into the soup bowl.

[NiggerBabyRocketLauncher]

Obama just knew all the right things to say to get elected. Americans are so gullible. I'm pretty confident that nothing is gonna change.

[k4aic]

I think Mccain probably COULD have pulled it off, if he wouldnt have chosen A DUMBASS BITCH...to be his VP..if he chose Romney or someone other than a clueless retarded whore..hmm..I think he could have pulled it off. Cause realistically he has a good chance of dying in the next 4 years.

I think the chance Palin would be in office scared more people to vote for obama ..

I like obama..but come on if the economy wasnt so horrid, and bush wasnt so bad for the past 8 years..I dont think he would have gotten in. He just came in at an opportunistic time in america..where everything is shitty

[PenguinsMakinLuv]

I don't think McCain really tried that hard to win. I think that he knew from the beginning he wasn't going to win.

[LSA King]

I don't think McCain really tried that hard to win. I think that he knew from the beginning he wasn't going to win.



When your fighting a uphill battle of racism, yeah he was doomed from the start.


Obama is like the Black Howard Dean, what Dem's and Libs have waited for 4 years for.

[freeRadical]

if theres one thing america needs right now its some socialism. Ever seen micheal moores sicko. Well that cant happen in a socialist country.

I've said this many times before, but apparently it's not getting through. Socialism does not work!!!! Plain and simple. Name me one socialist country that has prospered. You can't. Russia? Cuba? China? Capitalism is the best system. Why is America richer than other countries? Why is the quality of living better? How can America produce enough food to feed itself and the rest of the world? How can America afford to send aid to the majority of the world? Capitalism and free enterprise

BTW, I hate Obama because he is a fucking left-wing nut job socialist nigger, who is gonna run this country into the ground. kthxbai.

[Roll Fizzlebeef]

Your fucking retarded

Your retarded

Your

http://i40.tinypic.com/4rs505.jpg


No they're not

Truth Hurts

[LSA King]

Need a huge my lil nigger?

[Frank&Sense]

I've said this many times before, but apparently it's not getting through. Socialism does not work!!!! Plain and simple. Name me one socialist country that has prospered. You can't. Russia? Cuba? China? Capitalism is the best system. Why is America richer than other countries? Why is the quality of living better? How can America produce enough food to feed itself and the rest of the world? How can America afford to send aid to the majority of the world? Capitalism and free enterprise

BTW, I hate Obama because he is a fucking left-wing nut job socialist nigger, who is gonna run this country into the ground. kthxbai.

THIS!!!!!!!!! Finally someone who actually knows what they are talking about and who doesn't hate obama JUST cuz he's a nigger but because they actually don't like his policies. SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK!

[Roll Fizzlebeef]

Need a huge my lil nigger?

A huge what?

[Frank&Sense]

A huge what?

cock in his mouth. he needs one. :rolleyes:

[Acedia]

There's no difference, blacks are inferior to whites.

What exactly is your basis for this? Show me some factual, academic data proving to me that whites are even the least bit superior to any other race.
You're the same one who had the conspiracy theory right? Thought so.

[Angry Blue Bird of Death]

What exactly is your basis for this? Show me some factual, academic data proving to me that whites are even the least bit superior to any other race.
You're the same one who had the conspiracy theory right? Thought so.

Let's see, Europe hundreds of years ago was more advanced than Africa is today.

In America, Blacks are a smaller part of the population yet commit 10 times more murders than whites.

Look at South Africa, It was a poor country, Whites come in and now It's a successful country. Coincidence? Nope.

[lostmyface]

I've said this many times before, but apparently it's not getting through. Socialism does not work!!!! Plain and simple. Name me one socialist country that has prospered. You can't. Russia? Cuba? China? Capitalism is the best system. Why is America richer than other countries? Why is the quality of living better? How can America produce enough food to feed itself and the rest of the world? How can America afford to send aid to the majority of the world? Capitalism and free enterprise
.


you do realize that america has been a socialist state since 1933 and the passage of the new deal? you also realize that america has been at its strongest on the international scene since then. you also i am sure realize that america was at its weakest while practicing the policies of laise faire capitalism. remember the great depression of the 20's was due to a free market economy lacking oversight, not bound by regulations. funny how our current economic depression was also caused by lax regulations an insufficient government interference.

america produces its vast surplus of food by using genetically modified crops that pumped full of petrol based fertilizers from day one. it has little to do with economics an much more to do with science. russia beat us into space. china is beating us in trade. we failed to topple communist cuba for 50 plus years. India is one socialist country that has prospered. america is richer than other countries because it was able to get most of the developed world to take out loans from american banks during the 1940's. americas standard of living is also not the best in the world. that honor goes to several western europen countries, who have many socialist aspects to their economy. we send aid to most of the free world because most of the free world owes us lots of money via the international banking community that the usa controls.

[freeRadical]

you do realize that america has been a socialist state since 1933 and the passage of the new deal? you also realize that america has been at its strongest on the international scene since then. you also i am sure realize that america was at its weakest while practicing the policies of laise faire capitalism. remember the great depression of the 20's was due to a free market economy lacking oversight, not bound by regulations. funny how our current economic depression was also caused by lax regulations an insufficient government interference.

First off, America is not a true socialistic country. Private property and resources are still owned by the individual not the government. The economic questions of what to produce, how to produce it, and for whom will it be produced, are determined in the free markets by individual buyers and sellers. In order for a nation to be socialistic, these questions would all be answered by the government. We're on our way to becoming a socialist welfare state.

Second, the free market economy collapsing did not cause the Great Depression, the Great Depression caused the economy to collapse. The economy collapsing was just a symptom of the Great Depression. You do realize that because of government oversight, over-regulation, and socialistic economic policies, it took longer to come out of the depression then it should of. The Great Depression was cause by companies phonying up their books to lure potential investors, and when they couldn't deliver what they promised, the Great Depression happened. Greed and stupidity cause the Great Depression, not the failure of "hands off" government or the free market economy. The current recession, if you can call it that, it's differently not a depression, was not cause by decreased government regulation or oversight. It again was caused by greed and stupidity. There are many factors that lead into the cause of the current recession, and while I don't have time to fully discuss them, I will outline them for you. It all started with the sub-prime mortgage crisis, which led to the credit crunch, which led to the current recession. Not to mention stupid government regulation, like the Sarbanes-Oxley act, contributed to it, too.

america produces its vast surplus of food by using genetically modified crops that pumped full of petrol based fertilizers from day one. it has little to do with economics an much more to do with science. russia beat us into space. china is beating us in trade. we failed to topple communist cuba for 50 plus years. India is one socialist country that has prospered. america is richer than other countries because it was able to get most of the developed world to take out loans from american banks during the 1940's. americas standard of living is also not the best in the world. that honor goes to several western europen countries, who have many socialist aspects to their economy. we send aid to most of the free world because most of the free world owes us lots of money via the international banking community that the usa controls.

I really don't think you have a slightest clue what you are talking about. While I will admit I don't know much about how are food is produced, I will debate with you on your other points. I don't really care that Russia beat us into space, but the reason China is doing so well is because of us. If we didn't trade with them, but instead had an embargo with them, they would be no better off then Cuba. We could topple Cuba in a second; it wouldn't take much to simply run in there and take over. America's standard of living is better then the rest of the world's, including Europe's. Numerous studies have been conducted that prove I'm right. I don't get why so many people still believe the lie that Western Europe's standard of living is better then ours. About the loans. Most of the national debt is owned internally, not externally. We give aid to countries because we feel it is our duty to do so. We have the ability to do so, so we have the responsibility to do so.

[lostmyface]

First off, America is not a true socialistic country. Private property and resources are still owned by the individual not the government.

and neither are any of the examples you listed pure socialist. in fact no country has ever practiced pure socialism. that was kind of my point.

The economic questions of what to produce, how to produce it, and for whom will it be produced, are determined in the free markets by individual buyers and sellers. In order for a nation to be socialistic, these questions would all be answered by the government. We're on our way to becoming a socialist welfare state.

if by individual buyers an sellers you mean massive multinational corporations that receive government money an support for what they produce, and if by free markets you mean a market with strict tarriffs an subsidies then i agree with you 110%. but if you are trying to say that individual people choose what to grow buy an sell with out any interference from the government, then i am going to call you a liar.

Second, the free market economy collapsing did not cause the Great Depression, the Great Depression caused the economy to collapse. The economy collapsing was just a symptom of the Great Depression.

sounds like a chicken an egg argument here. i think the economic collapse brought along the depression. you say the depression made the economy collapse.

You do realize that because of government oversight, over-regulation, and socialistic economic policies, it took longer to come out of the depression then it should of.

proof. show me one credible source for this claim.

The Great Depression was cause by companies phonying up their books to lure potential investors, and when they couldn't deliver what they promised, the Great Depression happened. Greed and stupidity cause the Great Depression, not the failure of "hands off" government or the free market economy.


it was the hands off policies that allowed that fraud to occur. if there had been more oversight the fraud would not have happened.




The current recession, if you can call it that, it's differently not a depression, was not cause by decreased government regulation or oversight. It again was caused by greed and stupidity. There are many factors that lead into the cause of the current recession, and while I don't have time to fully discuss them, I will outline them for you. It all started with the sub-prime mortgage crisis, which led to the credit crunch, which led to the current recession. Not to mention stupid government regulation, like the Sarbanes-Oxley act, contributed to it, too.


the greed an stupidity that was allowed due to lax regulations. christ do you even know what the sub prime mortgage crisis is about? do you understand why we are in a credit crunch now?


I really don't think you have a slightest clue what you are talking about. While I will admit I don't know much about how are food is produced, I will debate with you on your other points.

i dont think you have any idea either. if you did know what you were talking about you would realize our current mortgages crisis much like the banking crisis of the 1930's is do to a lack of regulations.

[/QUOTE]I don't really care that Russia beat us into space, but the reason China is doing so well is because of us. If we didn't trade with them, but instead had an embargo with them, they would be no better off then Cuba. [/QUOTE]

you should care russia beat us into space. a socialist government was able to outsmart an out compete a capitalist state. and that was not the first time they did that. russia won the european theater of world war two. the only reason we dont speak russian now is because stalin was a mad man an most of his successors were incompetent.

as far as china, why do you think we trade with them? its not because we are joe friendly. it is because they have something that we want. the produce stuff better an more efficiently then we do. that is why everything you own was made in china, not america.

if we did not trade with china it would be our loss not theirs. you really think europe africa south america and the rest of asia would not trade with china?


We could topple Cuba in a second; it wouldn't take much to simply run in there and take over.

tell that to the CIA an the 1500 members of the cuba expeditionary force

America's standard of living is better then the rest of the world's, including Europe's. Numerous studies have been conducted that prove I'm right. I don't get why so many people still believe the lie that Western Europe's standard of living is better then ours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index
http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/
http://skeptically.org/economics/id21.html
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Human-Development-Index
o rly?

About the loans. Most of the national debt is owned internally, not externally. We give aid to countries because we feel it is our duty to do so. We have the ability to do so, so we have the responsibility to do so.

i never said most of our debt was external.(though most of our trade debt is owed to china) i said we became a prosperous nation by getting many foreign nations to owe us money. especially after world war one an world war two. do you honestly believe we give aid because we think it is our duty? if that was the case the usa would have donated all of the money it promised to the UN's millennium foundation, or any of the other international groups we promised aid to. we donate money because it furthers our socio-economic political goals. period.

[Slapshot]

Show me some factual, academic data proving to me that whites are even the least bit superior to any other race.

MMMkay.... here ya go!

IQ is genetic (http://www.slate.com/id/2178122/entry/2178123/)
Tests do show an IQ deficit, not just for Africans relative to Europeans, but for Europeans relative to Asians. Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there's strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic. It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true."

"Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Jewish Americans, it was 113. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide black average. It's been that way for at least a century."

intelligence (http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap14.html)
The single most important trait that man has is his intelligence and therefore its absence is the single most important primitive trait."

"There is also considerable evidence that brain size and intelligence correlate strongly between human populations, as both increase from Bushmen to Australian aborigines to s-S Africans to Caucasians to NE Asians."

Race As A Biological Concept (http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/stalkers/jpr01.html)
Here I will briefly summarize the findings. Asians and Africans consistently aggregate at opposite ends, with Europeans intermediate, on a continuum that includes over 60 anatomical and social variables. These 60 variables include brain size, intelligence, sexual habits, fertility, personality, temperament, speed of maturation, and longevity. If race were an arbitrary, socially-constructed concept, devoid of all biological meaning, such consistent relationships would not exist.

The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data).

Now, YOU show ME one single academic, scientific study that shows all races to be "equal" on ANY level.

[Yggdrasil]

IQ tests are culturally biased, oaf

[Slapshot]

IQ tests are culturally biased, oaf

Reading is fundamental, dickhead.

For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture).


Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there's strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic.

[Pringles]

I like where this thread is going. Obama is only HALF black.

[ACE_187]

I like where this thread is going. Obama is only HALF black.

half black 100% nigger :D

niggers are ugly, and stupid, i dont really have anything to say about them. obama is just another nigger, who was put there to make all the stupid white liberals feel all warm and fuzzy inside. nothing he does, or says will change anything i am going to do. i am not a taxpayer, and i dont contribute anything to this shithole of a country. :)

[Slapshot]

I like where this thread is going. Obama is only HALF black.

Still a crutch. Quadroons are niggers no matter how the ignorant TV zombies spin it.

"all races are equal"
"race doesn't matter"
"blacks are equal to whites" (perhaps the most inflamatory statement, as there is absolutely no scientific evidence to support their claims, while there are literally hundreds of scientific studies to the contrary)
And the mind-numbing "hate" comments, fermented by big business news media hammering "hate" crimes and "hate" speech into the zombie's heads....

And what's with the whole "nazi" name-calling BS? Fucking-A, they call THEMSELVES nazis, do you actually think that's an insult? It's like calling a police officer a cop. Jesus Christ Cocksucker, I've never met a human being so fucking ignorant and brainwashed as a progressive liberal douchbag.

[molotov in the mornin]

barack is as black as strom thurmond. He hates blacks but he'll fuck them

[Slapshot]

barack is as black as strom thurmond. He hates blacks but he'll fuck them

I'll believe it when I see it.

[LSA King]

I like where this thread is going. Obama is only HALF black.




Thats comparing the endless debate? Is the glass half-full or half-empty? Doesn't matter there is still half of it there regardless and that doesn't change in the equation.

[Slapshot]

you should care russia beat us into space. a socialist government was able to outsmart an out compete a capitalist state. and that was not the first time they did that. russia won the european theater of world war two. the only reason we dont speak russian now is because stalin was a mad man an most of his successors were incompetent. It is prudent to note that BOTH the US and USSR benefitted from reverse-engineered GERMAN rockets, which is ONE of the reasons the USSR had a lead in the space race. The other reason was their complete lack of concern for the safety of their cosmonauts.

It is also noteworthy that the first nation on the planet that harnessed the power of the atom was the US, the USSR again, reverse-engineering stolen intelligence from the US. So it is the combination of GERMAN rocket science and GERMAN/AMERICAN nuclear physics that gave Russia the mirage of a superpower, when they were nothing more than a large, rogue nuclear power doomed to financial collapse. They simply couldn't afford to support the image that they were so desperate to convey.

[GatorWarrior]

I agree that our current system of electing the president is kind of screwy, it really should be decided by popular vote, not the electoral college.

In either case, McCain still loses. 10 million people's opinions apparently matter quite a bit.

Common Misconception.
America is not a democracy.
It's a Federal Constitutional Republic.

[Evil con Carne]

Your fucking retarded.
The irony.

[Roll Fizzlebeef]

So according to the IQ tests, Asians are the superior race.

Feels good man.

[Slapshot]

So according to the IQ tests, Asians are the superior race.

Feels good man.

Whites are OK with that, but try telling it to the niggers... they'll chimpout, scream at the top of their lungs, and beat sticks on the ground while they jump around trying to intimidate that which is superior to them.

[chaos]

I've said this many times before, but apparently it's not getting through. Socialism does not work!!!! Plain and simple. Name me one socialist country that has prospered. You can't.

Sweden, Finland, China. Unless you want to adhere to the Marxist definition of socialism. In which case, you're an idiot.

[Acedia]

Now, YOU show ME one single academic, scientific study that shows all races to be "equal" on ANY level.

I don't need to see factual data showing me that me and a black guy are made up of the same parts, and that the only real difference anatomically is the color of our skins.

Those tests are more than likely culturally biased, and as far as I knew IQ is really only a measure of your ability to succeed in an academic environment, which is too affected by culture to be a question of race.

[lostmyface]

It is prudent to note that BOTH the US and USSR benefitted from reverse-engineered GERMAN rockets, which is ONE of the reasons the USSR had a lead in the space race. The other reason was their complete lack of concern for the safety of their cosmonauts.


hmm, correct me if i am wrong but wasn't the regime in control of germany at that time a socialist one?

also, your inability to provide counter points to anything that i listed in my previous post makes me assume that you have conceded defeat.

as far as your question on racial superiority, i would like to point you in the direction of any anthropological work written after 1940. if you want i can recommend some for you, but i am sure you are familiar with Google.

[lostmyface]

Now, YOU show ME one single academic, scientific study that shows all races to be "equal" on ANY level.

Human taxonomy is the classification of the species Homo sapiens (Latin: "wise man"), or modern human. Homo is the human genus, which also includes Neanderthals and many other extinct species of hominid; H. sapiens is the only surviving species of the genus Homo. Extinct Homo species are known as archaic humans. Modern humans are the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, differentiated from a direct ancestor, Homo sapiens idaltu.

Prior to the current scientific classification of humans, philosophers and scientists have made various attempts to classify humans. They offered various definitions of the human being and various schemes for classifying types of humans. Biologists once classified races as subspecies, but today scientists question even the concept of race itself. Certain issues in human taxonomy remain topics of debate today.

Extended scientific classification

The modern scientific classification of the human species contains many sub- and super- sections (each one being, ideally, a clade) which have been interpolated between the seven traditional Linnaean taxonomic ranks.

Humans are not only the sole surviving representatives of the genus Homo but also the only surviving representatives of the subtribe Hominina, which includes Australopithecus and other more anthropomorphic hominids. Species believed to be ancestors are listed within higher taxa.


* Biota [all life on Earth]
* Cytota [all cellular life]
* Superdomain - Neomura [contains Eukarya and Archaea]
* Domain - Eukarya
* Subdomain - Unikonta [only one flagellum]
* Superkingdom - Opisthokonts [animals and fungi]
* Kingdom - Animalia/Metazoa
* (Eumetazoa)
* SubkingdomBilateria [having bilateral symmetry]
* (Coelomata) [...and a fluid-filled body cavity]
* (Branch) - Deuterostomia (Superphylum)
* Infrakingdom - Chordonia
* Phylum - Chordata
* (Craniata) [animals with skulls]
* Subphylum - Vertebrata [...and backbones]
* Infraphylum - Gnathostomata[...and jaws]
* Superclass - Tetrapoda [...and four limbs]
* (Series) - Amniota [...and amniotic eggs]
* Mammaliaformes
* Class - Mammalia [all mammals]
* Subclass - Theriiformes
* Infraclass - Holotheria
* Superlegion - Trechnotheria
* Legion - Cladotheria
* Sublegion - Zatheria
* Infralegion - Tribosphenica
* Supercohort - Theria
* Cohort - Eutheria
* Magnorder - Euarchontoglires
* Superorder - Euarchonta
* Grandorder - Archonta
* Order - Primates
* Suborder - Haplorrhini
* Infraorder - Simiiformes [apes and monkeys]
* Parvorder - Catarrhini
* Superfamily - Hominoidea [apes]

Species - Proconsul africanus

* Family - Hominidae [great apes]
* Subfamily - Homininae [includes gorillas but not orangutans]

Species - Pierolapithecus catalaunicus

* Tribe - Hominini [includes chimpanzees but not gorillas]

Species - Sahelanthropus tchadensis, common ancestor with chimpanzees[citation needed]
Species - Orrorin tugenensis, first species after split with chimpanzees[citation needed]

* Subtribe - Hominina [humans are the only surviving species]

Genus - Ardipithecus
Genus - Kenyanthropus

Australopithecines

Genus - Australopithecus
Genus - Paranthropus

* Genus - Homo

Species - Homo habilis
Species - Homo ergaster
Species - Homo erectus
Species - Homo heidelbergensis

* Species - Homo sapiens

Subspecies - Homo sapiens idaltu

Subspecies - Homo sapiens sapiens

Current issues in human taxonomy

Generally, humans are considered the only surviving representatives of the genus Homo. Some scientists, however, consider other members of the hominid family (chimpanzees and gorillas) to be so close to humans genetically that they should be classified as Homo.

Scientists have also debated whether any other branches of Homo, such as Neanderthals, should be classified as separate species or subspecies of H. sapiens. These distinctions are connected with two competing theories of human origins, the more common recent single-origin hypothesis (that modern humans represent a distinct gene pool) and the multiregional hypothesis (that modern humans spreading from Africa interbred with local Homo populations). Modern humans have some genes that originally arose in archaic human populations, composing perhaps 5% of our genetic inheritance. (For example, see microcephalin.)

Species within the genus Homo are generally regarded as human. Australopithecines, too, are often referred to as human. Lay people sometimes ask whether the species other than H. sapiens were truly human. Were Neanderthals, for example, actually human or just close to human? This question makes sense in an essentalist philosophy, in which humans have an essential identity, and in which Neanderthals either did or did not share that identity. In metaphysical context, the question might be phrased as "Did Neanderthals have souls?" In natural science, however, the term "human" is seen as a category whose boundaries humans themselves determine. The question, in this context, is not whether this or that species had the quality of being human in some absolute sense, but whether we choose to define the category of human as including that species.

History of human taxonomy

Human taxonomy has involved both placing humans within the hominid family (or within the animal kingdom in general) and classifying types of humans within the species.


As recorded in the Hebrew Bible, ancient Hebrews classified humans as a kind of living soul (nephesh, roughly "breather"). Living things were said to beget their own kind, a group broader than the scientific species. Humans were said to comprise a single kind.

Humans have long been considered animals. Plato referred to humans as featherless biped animals, and Aristotle defined the human being as the "rational animal" or the "political animal". Classic and medieval taxonomy grouped living things according to characteristics, and classifying humans as animals meant that they have various animal characteristics (moving, eating, breathing, etc.). Modern taxonomy, on the other hand, classifies organisms according to evolutionary lines of descent. Current opposition to classifying humans as animals arises from this modern definition of what it means to be an animal (that is, a descendent of a common animal ancestor that lived over 500 million years ago).

When Linnaeus defined humans as Homo sapiens in 1758, they were the only members of the genus Homo. The first other species to be classified a Homo was H. neanderthalensis, classified in 1864. Since then, ten additional extinct species have been classified as Homo.

In a common misunderstanding of evolutionary theory, each species represents a stage in the evolutionary track, some “more evolved” and others further behind. Based on this misunderstanding, scientists thought of humans as having descended from modern apes and expected to find the “missing link,” a living species halfway between apes and humans.


History of classifying types of humans

Europeans in the Middle Ages considered humanity to be divided into three races, one for each of the sons of Noah (see Japhetic). This concept was so powerful when Europeans discovered Americans some of them considered the Americans to be soulless animals.

Races were once considered human subspecies, but genetic research shows that inherited differences do not accurately match common racial divisions. For example, since non-Africans are descended from a small population that emigrated from Africa about 100,000 years ago, non-Africans (even those representing difference races) are more closely related to each other than Africans are to each other.