PDA

View Full Version : The Female Personality


Cult Leader
05-19-2009, 03:39 AM
I would firstly like to state that this thread is more intended at garnering other's perspectives then for sharing any kind of novel idea of my own. I don't believe I have a very good understanding of the issue and am more intent on further evolving my current frame of mind.

A few months back I used to be involved with counseling for depression and anxiety, my counselor was female. I was completely honest, I'd tell her everything, all my personal insecurities and even things that could have gotten me in trouble IRL. At the midway point of our series of discussions she asked me whether I "hated" women. The question caught me off guard, I certainly didn't feel like I hated them, but something did click when she asked that.

What clicked was something I wasn't too conscious of... I am not sure what it could be called, perhaps chauvinism or sexism, but regardless I began discussing my views on women in an attempt to be enlightened and evolve my thinking. Needless to say she didn't seem very comfortable with the subject that she brought up. She seemed to "wall-up" her defenses and from that point on she decided to divert every session into a massive argument attempting to convince me to go on meds. Her battles for me to go on meds were entirely uncalled for and after trying for many sessions to apologize in the case that anything I said about women offended her, I decided to call it quits. I was very disappointed because until the female gender was discussed everything was going so good.

Now finally on to the subject: What I perceive to be the mind of the woman. Weak, dependent and willing to submit. Thats a basic summary of what I believe if I zoom out and really examine. All my life experiences point to this. The so-called "strong women" merely erect an elaborate defense system and if you push past enough of the lies there is always the weak and scared child underneath.

Is it an evolutionary reaction intended to foster dependence ensuring that the female secures a mate in order to propagate? Are women biologically engineered to be weak and dependent? The counselor's voice on these issues was always a kind of "women are equal to men, we just have different styles" type mantra. Bullshit if you ask me.

I don't think being dependent or weak are bad things though, I'd prefer just the bullshit to be swept aside. Their weakness could even be seen as a strength because it ensures a strong mate which can handle her bullshit and will spread his genes to her which will create millions more strong little men loyal to her and her protection.

Well I can't really think of anything more to add on the subject at the moment (it's getting late) but I would appreciate the input of Z-Nation.

Nero
05-19-2009, 01:52 PM
Women are equal to men, just in different ways (as she said). While men are more obviously strong, emotionally-balanced, independent etc., women are extremely adept in areas like lying, cheating and manipulation. Trust me on this.

For example, if you get a girlfriend, it's very possible that she could win your trust and make you fall in love with her. Then where are you? As intelligent and strong as you think you are for being a man, what good does it do when you're in the most vulnerable position possible, and the one person who decides whether you're blissfully happy or utterly miserable is a woman? All I'm saying is think about it.

Also:

after trying for many sessions to apologize in the case that anything I said about women offended her


What I perceive to be the mind of the woman. Weak, dependent and willing to submit.

:rolleyes:

Cult Leader
05-19-2009, 04:55 PM
women are extremely adept in areas like lying, cheating and manipulation. Trust me on this.


Oh I know. I suppose that could be perceived as a strength. Those are probably the aspects about woman that piss me off the most LOL.

Nero
05-20-2009, 09:18 AM
And don't even get me started on how women can use sex to obtain complete control over a man.

You know, pussy whipping. :thumbsup:

Cult Leader
05-20-2009, 01:48 PM
And don't even get me started on how women can use sex to obtain complete control over a man.

You know, pussy whipping. :thumbsup:

Yeah one of my best buds has had that happen. I am honestly thinking of tape recording some of the things he says just so he can hear how fucking whipped he is.

Like we will go out and hell be driving and then a panicked look will be on his face and hell say something like "I gotta check on Brook". Hell call her to try to get her out of the house for a smoke and shell be like "naw im sleeping" and he will literally beg until she comes out, lol...:rolleyes:

HARDMAN
05-20-2009, 06:35 PM
Well I have to ask you, DO you hate women? If so, why? If they're inferior and you consider yourself a chauvinist, then you would probably just have pity on them. But in your heart you know they can be just as powerful as men.

Women are just as capable in life as men, just in different ways. Men are better at comprehending the concepts of strength, honor, respect, discipline, courage, and strategy, women are better at manipulation, lying, cheating, deceiving, plotting, seducing, reading emotions.

While it's obvious men are superior to the women, that's not to say that men are more powerful or dangerous than women.

SLIM
05-20-2009, 07:22 PM
Women don't have to be good at anything else, just sex.

ArmsMerchant
05-20-2009, 07:26 PM
There is no such thing as a "female personality."

Women are individuals--some of whom, sadly, may conform to unevolved stereotypes, however.

ThePhoenix
05-20-2009, 08:19 PM
There is no such thing as a "female personality."

Women are individuals--some of whom, sadly, may conform to unevolved stereotypes, however.

Thank you.

ATTN: This is the end of the thread, please exit now.

Cult Leader
05-21-2009, 03:10 PM
Thank you.

ATTN: This is the end of the thread, please exit now.

LOL

Yeah I agree with greyfox, but that doesn't negate what I am saying.

Cult Leader
05-21-2009, 03:12 PM
Well I have to ask you, DO you hate women? If so, why? If they're inferior and you consider yourself a chauvinist, then you would probably just have pity on them. But in your heart you know they can be just as powerful as men.

Women are just as capable in life as men, just in different ways. Men are better at comprehending the concepts of strength, honor, respect, discipline, courage, and strategy, women are better at manipulation, lying, cheating, deceiving, plotting, seducing, reading emotions.

While it's obvious men are superior to the women, that's not to say that men are more powerful or dangerous than women.

I don't hate women, but I know that I feel superior to them.

They're such pussies...:D

Struwwelpeter
05-21-2009, 10:52 PM
There is no such thing as a "female personality."



False. Females produce far less testosterone and much more estrogen than men which incapacitates them from thinking like and behaving like men, who produce far less estrogen and much more testosterone. It is a well-established fact that sex hormones are linked to behavior, thought processes, perception and control. Furthermore women have different brain sizes than men which is determined by their cranial characteristics. Women are also far different physiologically and superficially (appearance) than men and this obviously contributes to their natural predisposed ways. The only women who don't act like men are either a.) pretending or b.) misusing androgenic/anabolic steroids, substances which should only be legally entrusted to athletes and the ill (not counting the ill who do not deserve it, such as the AIDS-infected homosexuals).

women are individuals


"Individual humans" are just that. Cybernetic organisms that evolved from the same common ancestor and in the same fashion as the modern cockroach. A woman with an individual personality is just that, however, women are endowed so kindly by mother nature with female sex hormones and thus female behavior, and are entitled to their right to reserve this behavior, for without humans would not be humans but rather bathing in their own feces. Any woman who tries to be a man and any man who tries to be a woman is pretending to be something they are not, this is a sign of insecurity and severe mental disorder and should be treated as such, not encouraged, as you and your fellow leftist degenerates so often do on this website, for it is a component of mental and moral degeneracy and unhealthy for the planet.

Struwwelpeter
05-21-2009, 11:05 PM
I must add that that neither women nor men are inherently superior to one another, it's all relative to the same playing field. And it has nothing to do with the fact that women today can tend to be more deceitful and less moral than men. Without women who would have looked after our ancestors as their fathers went out to hunt? Who would have done the gathering in society? Today men are gradually being exposed to the same behaviors women adapted to and that is a serious threat to the biological state of humanity. Some areas are reserved for women and some are reserved for men, and that's the bottom line.

Azure
05-21-2009, 11:25 PM
I +1'd you just for posting, that's how great you are.

Struwwelpeter
05-21-2009, 11:35 PM
Well thank you, how kind of you.

Azure
05-21-2009, 11:36 PM
Well thank you, how kind of you.

And yet again I find myself agreeing with you; Spot on about Greyfox and his wishy-washy faggotry.

InspiredByMe
05-21-2009, 11:41 PM
The Female Personality........



SUCKS.

Struwwelpeter
05-21-2009, 11:49 PM
And yet again I find myself agreeing with you; Spot on about Greyfox and his wishy-washy faggotry.

Muchos gracias. :cool:

Nero
05-22-2009, 02:55 AM
Thank you.

ATTN: This is the end of the thread, please exit now.

If Greyfox claimed that the world was flat, you'd no doubt accept it as fact and promptly quote it with a /thread.

That goes for anyone else who practices dogmatic Greyfoxism. Just contribute your own original ideas, or shut your fucking face hole.

SLIM
05-22-2009, 03:36 PM
Bruce "fuck jews" Willis knows what he's talking about, unlike greyfox. What makes it funnier is that he's a paki. His death spell thread was hilarious.

ThePhoenix
05-22-2009, 05:22 PM
If Greyfox claimed that the world was flat, you'd no doubt accept it as fact and promptly quote it with a /thread.

That goes for anyone else who practices dogmatic Greyfoxism. Just contribute your own original ideas, or shut your fucking face hole.


HAHA. Very well. :p

I'm not denying the difference between the male and female brain. My position is that that while there are innate differences, no one can accurately predict how those difference translate into behavioral differences between the sexes. Most scientisst now accept a biopsychosocial approach to brain, recognizing that psychological, genetic and social factors affect the brain.
For example, some men see women as emotionally unstable, I would argue that that men are just as emotionally unstable but that instability morphs into anger and violence which is acceptable.

Now, lets assume that there are personalities.
It seems to me that men accept simple generalizations only when they provide positive attributes. ChiChi said that women are more adept than men at cheating, lying and manipulation. If that is true, how does does one explain the corruption seen in governments and institutions dominated by men ( Watergate, Bush-Cheney, Madoff).
Men seem to refuse the positve traits associated with women offer, increased verbal ability, increased ability to plan for the future.

Men tend to define women as abberrant, deviant and inferior and that has been evidenced by the posts in this thread. The underlying assumption here is that the "male type" brain is standard. I encourage people to understand the positive and negative traits associated with each gender. When people explore that, they will realized that there is no inferior or superior gender regardless of societal and psychological factors.

IMO, there is a danger associated with "personalities". It assumes that there is no personality range, either you are or you aren't. This relegates women and men to certain gender roles, roles that some men/women may not agree with.

Sorry this is kinda disorganized. Ask questions for clarity.

Eternal
05-28-2009, 12:57 AM
You're all fucked.
Maybe you should go talk to a woman.

Syphilis
05-28-2009, 01:03 AM
Now finally on to the subject: What I perceive to be the mind of the woman. Weak, dependent and willing to submit. Thats a basic summary of what I believe if I zoom out and really examine.

True.

Are women biologically engineered to be weak and dependent? The counselor's voice on these issues was always a kind of "women are equal to men, we just have different styles" type mantra. Bullshit if you ask me.

Yes. It's evolution.

They're obviously not equal, biologically, which is a fact.

And don't even get me started on how women can use sex to obtain complete control over a man.

Women are equal to men, just in different ways (as she said). While men are more obviously strong, emotionally-balanced, independent etc., women are extremely adept in areas like lying, cheating and manipulation. Trust me on this.

For example, if you get a girlfriend, it's very possible that she could win your trust and make you fall in love with her. Then where are you? As intelligent and strong as you think you are for being a man, what good does it do when you're in the most vulnerable position possible, and the one person who decides whether you're blissfully happy or utterly miserable is a woman? All I'm saying is think about it.

I'd say this is more down to weak men, rather than strong women.

Duelist
10-02-2009, 07:46 AM
Yes I would say that they both should be seen as equals in the eyes of the law. No three-fifths compromise here.


Women have been enabled with certain traits (cleavage, delicious creamy thighs) at the expense of other traits (logic, decisiveness).

Despite these evolutionary "disadvantages" they still hold ultimate power over me. My cock will follow the vagina as the vine follows the beanpole.

They are like the borg, crossing the universe, assimilating and distributing.

Reaping all of the traits that the species brings, growing stronger every day.

It is the corpus callosum holding this all together. We are staying on the tracks, dispite great forces acing on us from all sides.

hooloovoo
10-02-2009, 07:50 PM
While men are more obviously strong, emotionally-balanced, independent etc.

If this is true then what does does that make you, eh chich? :p

Ambient
10-03-2009, 07:07 AM
I think its been said already here. Identity is primarily socially constructed, the matter is how potential is actualised. Its basically "psychological propensity" that seperates men and women, but I do not believe there are any qualities or characteristics that a female can embody that a male cannot, therefore there is no absolute masculinity or femeninity persay.

Duelist
10-05-2009, 12:23 AM
that sounds like tranny talk

Death_Merchant
10-05-2009, 09:49 PM
Well I have to ask you, DO you hate women? If so, why? If they're inferior and you consider yourself a chauvinist, then you would probably just have pity on them. But in your heart you know they can be just as powerful as men.

Women are just as capable in life as men, just in different ways. Men are better at comprehending the concepts of strength, honor, respect, discipline, courage, and strategy, women are better at manipulation, lying, cheating, deceiving, plotting, seducing, reading emotions.

While it's obvious men are superior to the women, that's not to say that men are more powerful or dangerous than women.

Your thinking goes right out the window when you meet a guy like me, which I believe will be the next generation of what men will be like. What I'm talking about is the reaction to how women have evolved. Our culture is a result of the strongest wills in society. Over the past 50 years, women have created new understandings and adapted. Now men are adapting to the modern woman.

I've mastered all the things that make men great like strength, honor, respect, discipline, courage and strategy. However, seeing that women were squaring off against us, I decided to become proficient in the female arts of manipulation, lying, cheating, deceiving, plotting, seducing, and reading emotions. The feminists being so arrogant, never thought that men might adapt the same strategy, which would result in a reversal of roles back to what they were.

An example would be with my GF. She's fairly dominant, but she's starting to realize that I make her happy, controlling me is impossible, but she still wants to keep me. She knows other women want me too, so she has to make compromises to make sure they don't offer me something better. She's cock whipped, lol. Now she's becoming more and more submissive everyday. I get sex whenever I want it. She never says no. She take my dishes to the dishwasher, and she's even taking interest in learning how to cook for me. I'm training her to be my wife. She's starting to understand that I don't have time for these things, and the woman I need, is one who will do these things.

Times are changing.

AdMech
10-05-2009, 10:13 PM
Most wars fought by men throughout history were won by courage, honor, and strength. Most rich men got their fortunes through the same skills.

Huh... for some reason that doesn't sound right. :p The past is nothing but a chronicle of lies and deception.

Throughout history, everyone - male and female - has cheated, manipulated, lied, and deceived. It's a mistake to assume this has changed, or that either gender has ever had a monopoly on it.