View Full Version : Pheromone of Social Delusion: Theory, Discovery and Primary Test Results.
talonner
08-07-2009, 10:54 AM
I found this interesting article:
Preliminary research has revealed that the Social Delusion so prevalent in Homo Sapiens can be traced to a pheromone.
The Social Delusion pheromone is produced when a person feels himself to be part of, and accepted by, a group of people. When a person -- for example, an autistic person -- does not feel part of the group, he will not produce the Social Delusion pheromone. The Vomeronasal Organs (VNO's) of people in the group will therefore have no Social Delusion pheromone to react to. Group members will immediately perceive a Social Delusion pheromone non-producer to be an outsider, and will behave accordingly.
The Social Delusion pheromone was discovered by placing pheromone aggregators in the air exhaust vents of the Astrodome during a football game. The ISNT research team first considered using the pheromone collectors in Times Square on New Year's Eve but decided against it because of possible wind conditions. The Astrodome proved a successful location for obtaining a plentiful supply of pheromonal material.
The resulting pheromones were purified at the ISNT Laboratory. Since this breakthrough, an antidote (Swarming Inhibitor) has been found to deactivate the Vomeronasal Organ, making it insensitive to pheromonal influence.
It was discovered that the Swarming Inhibitor (SI), or VNO deactivator, has an interesting effect on newborn elephants. The baby elephant's VNO is typically activated by a pheromone produced by its mother. This pheromone sends a signal to the baby's amygdala, stimulating nurture-seeking behaviors. By exposing the newborn to a small amount of SI, we were able to cause it to back away from its mother. Though the experiment was immediately reversed to prevent harm to the newborn, it's obvious that such experiments would be inappropriate for human beings.
The ISNT Pheromone Research Group was able to test their conclusions at various sports events. Microphones placed in sports arenas were connected to a computer that measured the noise level produced by fans. Where the aggregation pheromone was introduced, the level of cheering went up 48%, whereas in areas where the Swarming Inhibitor was introduced cheering diminished to almost imperceptible levels, and in some cases, sports fans got up and left. When interviewed about their reason for leaving, many fans said that suddenly they didn't know why they came in the first place. One young woman said that she had suddenly started to laugh at the beefy looking guys running around in strange costumes, had felt self-conscious and had decided to leave.
The ISNT Research Laboratory has offered the U.S. Army the use of the Swarming Inhibitor as a tactical weapon. It could be crop-dusted over the Serbians, for example, to destroy the nationalistic cohesion and prevent them from attacking Bosnians and Muslims. The Army declined this offer, however, because of the fear that some of this powerful material might escape within the ranks of the U.S. Military, causing the soldiers to forget what they are doing.
For further information about pheromones, these sites have relevant information:
* http://neuro.fsu.edu/research/vomer.htm
* http://qlink.queensu.ca/~4nlb3/
* http://www.psych.purdue.edu/~esmith/scsi1.html
http://isnt.autistics.org/perkons/pheromone.html
They do train using synthetic pheromones, which can be used as 'activators'.
Emulated_Reality
08-07-2009, 03:26 PM
Good find here. I will be looking into this more for sure. Think of the future, using this sort of pheromone to break religious fervor, nationalism/patriotism, capitalist venture. Breaking social delusion could be the key to making a more humanistic society (if it works as the descriptor says). My understanding is that it makes people look at the situation realistically? If so, this could be a alternate way of inducing psychedelic realization in the masses.
Bravo sir.
talonner
08-07-2009, 04:07 PM
I had an excessively large VNO and was highly sensitive to pheromones.
Due to pheromones being available to purchase on the market by civilians, I was taken advantage of by many, many people who thought it would be fun to bed me, or make me do things, generally abuse me and treat me as an animal or experiment or for their own amusement, which was horrible.
I was also sensitive to synthetic pheros used as activators.
I had it surgically removed.
I sort of miss it, however I definitely DON'T miss lacking the ability to lose self control.
If it wasn't for that I'd wish to still have my VNO. It was, for want of a better word, useful in regards to many things, however reality would be distorted, eg a football I thought was my baby after it got a spray with pheros of a newborn, even though I could see it was a football.
However I was excessively sensitive, and am to most stimuli, and perhaps a large amount of pheros were used.
I am also what you'd call a 'natural'.
You don't exactly recall the situation as 'being there' when phero'd either, or perhaps that is only at high doses.
talonner
08-07-2009, 04:11 PM
I also produce excessive amounts of oxytocin (maybe not so much now due to the fucking brain damage I got which I DIDN'T consent to) so I don't need pheros to bond.
Anyway, perhaps they should not be used on people.
If you get a chance try and have a look at the 'Gay Bomb'. I assume that is pheromones.
AtrainV
08-07-2009, 04:53 PM
Leave it to Talonner to take some interesting information and turn it into a conspiracy.
crazzyass
08-07-2009, 05:00 PM
I find it most disturbing that scientists are allowed to conduct experiments on us in public, without our knowledge or consent, with potentially dangerous materials.
talonner
08-07-2009, 05:01 PM
Leave it to Talonner to take some interesting information and turn it into a conspiracy.
Leave it to you to completely misrepresent what I am trying to convey.
We all understand your limited lack of understanding and intellect.
In future, please do not assume to understand the message I am trying to deliver, because, as you have consistently done in the past, you will fail and get it wrong.
HARDMAN
08-07-2009, 07:16 PM
http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/baffle_them_with_bullshit_trollcat1.jpg
Cytosine
08-08-2009, 03:17 AM
I find it most disturbing that scientists are allowed to conduct experiments on us in public, without our knowledge or consent, with potentially dangerous materials.
It was football game. Even if the fans had all gone berserk and started cannibalizing one another, nothing of value would have been lost.
And it would've been hilarious.
I had an excessively large VNO and was highly sensitive to pheromones.
Due to pheromones being available to purchase on the market by civilians, I was taken advantage of by many, many people who thought it would be fun to bed me, or make me do things, generally abuse me and treat me as an animal or experiment or for their own amusement, which was horrible.
I had it surgically removed.
Might I inquire how you got a surgeon to remove your VNO? I did a bit of research, and I didn't come across anything that discussed surgical removal of the VNO. It doesn't sound like a common procedure.
I mean, I understand what you've written and understand why you would want to have it removed since it was causing you pain. Did the surgeon sympathize with what you told him? (Just curious because I've never learned a lot about the VNO.)
talonner
08-09-2009, 03:50 AM
Might I inquire how you got a surgeon to remove your VNO? I did a bit of research, and I didn't come across anything that discussed surgical removal of the VNO. It doesn't sound like a common procedure.
I mean, I understand what you've written and understand why you would want to have it removed since it was causing you pain. Did the surgeon sympathize with what you told him? (Just curious because I've never learned a lot about the VNO.)
Not sure he was a qualified surgeon.
Scalpel, up the nose, cut out and dig in to make sure it was gone, there is a little bit there I think. Lots of blood.
Most people won't have issues with a VNO, but mine was really, really big. I would like be more than socially effected, I would sniff the air from a considerable distance and run over to someone and lack control of myself.
Combine that with people buying the stuff at the shops and Houston, we have a problem.
rabbit boy
08-09-2009, 04:06 AM
http://isnt.autistics.org/perkons/pheromone.html
Look at the top of the page. It says:
Note: This is humor. For more information see http://isnt.autistics.org/
talonner
08-09-2009, 04:58 AM
They got me again.
These Navy jerks sprayed a football with pheromones and I thought it was my baby.
Dude pheromone stuff is REAL. Even if that website is a joke.
AtrainV
08-09-2009, 05:04 AM
http://isnt.autistics.org/perkons/pheromone.html
Look at the top of the page. It says:
Note: This is humor. For more information see http://isnt.autistics.org/
:eek:
Guess that'll teach me to not check the source.
rabbit boy
08-09-2009, 05:09 AM
They got me again.
These Navy jerks sprayed a football with pheromones and I thought it was my baby.
Dude pheromone stuff is REAL. Even if that website is a joke.
Hmm. Yeah, pheromones sound real. Where are these Navy jerks getting their pheromones? It sounds like something that'd be fun to play with.
Also, I'm a bit confused. You said you had your VNO surgically removed. And now, the pheromones are still affecting you?
talonner
08-09-2009, 05:22 AM
It's a pretty good website. It says psychiatrists are idiots;
observe:
Psychiatries are a family of serious delusion related disorders. They are extremely dangerous, with the psychiatrist often becoming a danger to others. (It is many agree that psychiatry maybe the most severe and debilitating of the normal disorders.) Psychiatrists often use drugs, imprisonment, and harmful adversives on their victims. The primary area of delusion for in psychiatry centers on being a savior of sorts, who must rescue others from themselves using any means possible. Generally, psychiatrists believe they know what is best for all people. To "help" others, they perform all manner of strange rituals on these patients (sometimes called clients, consumers, or other politically correct terms). Unfortunately, this "help" tends to be covertly based on the psychiatrists goals and ideal, even if at odd with that of the patient, and is often quite harmful.
Psychiatrists tend to believe that they have a special understanding both of the minds of others, and of the nature of reality in general. They typically will believe that they know what is going through the minds of other ("Thought Decryption"), and, more importantly, what should be going through the minds of others. Often, it is believed that the thoughts or feelings of others are wrong, and that the persons mind must be fixed ("cured") to match what the psychiatrist thinks should be in the patient's mind. These beliefs about having a special understanding of others minds are sometimes referred to as "first rank" symptoms of psychiatry, though it is unlikely that they are pathonomic of psychiatry. Any disagreement with the psychiatrist's views or refusal of treatment is likely to be taken as a sign of just how "disturbed" (thinking incorrectly) the "patient" is. In addition, psychiatrists often believe that their own view of reality is absolutely correct, or at least close enough to judge other views as wrong, defective, or delusional. Views of patients that conflict with those of the psychiatrist are taken as signs of severe disease, and as needing to be "cured." The views of psychiatrists, especially those ideas related to psychiatry (those listed as symptoms under criteria A.) are usually of delusional intensity, and are not responsive to reason or evidence. In fact, it has often been noted that reasoning with a psychiatrist will only strengthen these delusional beliefs, and cause the patient to be seen as even more defective. However, it should be remembered that most of these behaviors are not malicious, and in most cases the psychiatrist actually believes he or she is helping his or her victims.
* Patronization: This is the belief that the psychiatrist has the right to do whatever it takes to "help" others, even if its against the will of those whom are to be "helped."
* Responcibility: Like patronization, but in case the psychiatrist believes that well being of others is somehow his or her personal responsibility. As a result, obsessive or compulsive "help" behavior may be present, as the psychiatrist believes that is it his or her duty to help the "patients." Typically, this means forcing "treatments" on them because not to do so would be "unethical," "unprofessional," or just plain bad.
* Thought Decryption: This is the belief, as describe above, that the psychiatrist is somehow able to decipher the thoughts or feeling of other. The "deciphered" thoughts are often considered real, even in the face of conflicting evidence, such as the behavior or verbal report of a patient. Often considered a first rank symptom, and especially common in the para-Freud subtype of psychiatry. Often called "first rank" symptom, thought decryption may be the prevalent of all psychiatric delusions.
* Stereotyping: This is the belief that large numbers of very different people may be grouped into pre-defined categories of "illness." Virtually any unusual or deviant behavior may be classified as an "illness" in this way, and then these illness may then be "treated" (i.e., the person may be made "normal," or like the presumed mode of the populations). Often, it is assumed that what is good for one person in a certain category will be good for all or most others, and that they may be treated as all the same.
* Pseudoscientific: This is the belief that at unfounded, idiosyncratic, or just plain bizarre set of beliefs held by the psychiatrist (such as psychoanalysis or object relations theory), usually relating to the above themes, are actually a cutting edge science. Often used, this is used in direct contradiction to the open, questioning, and self-correcting spirit of good science, as a means validating the "correctness" of the psychiatrist's delusions. This helps to justify the delusional intensity of the psychiatrist belief system, and to intimidate patients into compliance (or authorities into forcing compliance) with the psychiatrist's "treatments."
Associated Features & Differential Diagnosis
Normal personality and neurotypicality are both quite common among psychiatrists, though their exact relationship is uncertain. It may be that the intolerance typical of normal personality leads to the formation of psychiatric delusions.
In addition, most 9though not all) psychiatrists have an impairment of receptive communication. Often, they will not listen, or fail to listen closely. They will often misinterpret statements made to them in such a way as to "prove" their preexisting delusions or to label the speaker as "sick." Further, they are often quite literal minded, frequently taking figurative sayings or metaphors as concrete statements (thus producing a belief that the speaker is delusional and/or hallucinating). Very frequently, psychiatrists will give stereotyped responses based on a category to which the patient is believed to belong, even if though they have nothing to do with what the patient said actually said. It is uncertain whether these communication deficits are specifically related to psychiatry, or to comorbid neurotypical disorder. Clinical experience, however, suggests these communication deficits may be especially common and severe among psychiatrists.
The name "psychiatry disorder" has been questioned in recent years, as it has been noted that an identical disorder exists in some clinical psychologist, social workers, and non-psychiatric medical professionals. Therefore, the diagnosis of psychiatry disorder should not be limited to professional psychiatrist. An interesting observation is that those with medical degrees are more likely to be of the bio-organized type (see below), while psychologists and social workers are more likely to be either robionic or pare-Freud.
Subtypes
The following are major subtypes of psychiatry commonly recognized:
* 669.10 Bio-Organized
1. Preoccupation with concepts of biological disease
2. Often uses medical "quick-fixes," such as psychotropic drugs, psychosurgery, or electroconvulsive therapy.
The bio-organized type of psychiatry is so named because they tend to organize their delusions around biological concepts, such as genetic defects and biochemical imbalances. Categories of difference are often held to be genetically based defective phenotypes, constituting disease, though other biologically based explanation for differences are sometimes found. Invariably, the inevitable biological difference found between behavior phenotypes are used to rationalize their classification as disease, however. In keeping with the biological out look, bio-organized psychiatrists typically use biomedical techniques, such as drugs, to make there patients normal. Once rare, the incidence of bio-organized psychiatry is quite high, so that the prevalence is increasing. There is evidence that bio-organized is now the most common type of psychiatry in US, and possibly the world.
* 669.20 Robionic
1. At least two of the following:
(a) Overly mechanical and superficial thinking, especially concerning human behavior
(b) Frequent use of "brainwashing" techniques, such as Applied Behavior Analysis and other conditioning methods
(c) Lack of a Theory of Mind Sinclair, 1997)
2. Does not meat the criteria for 669.10, bio-organized psychiatry.
The robionic form of psychiatry is so called because of the tendency for such psychiatrists to treat patient (and sometimes others) as robot like machines. Robionic psychiatrists, who often call themselves "behaviorists," typically use behavioral techniques, such as classical and operant conditioning or discrete trials to force others to conform to arbitrary standards of "normality." (Once common example of such a standard is to make a child "indistinguishable from ... normally developing peers," without consideration of the actual adaptiveness of such behavior.) Robionic psychiatrists are less likely to attack high-functioning adults than other psychiatrist, but are notorious for "training" children and less functional people.
* 669.30 Para-Freud
1. Delusions of Though Decryption Pressent
2. Preoccupation with elaborate symbol systems and elaborate schemes of an "unconscious" mind
3. Magical thinking
4. Does not meet criteria for 669.10 (bio-organized psychiatry) or 669.20 (robionic psychiatry)
Para-Freud psychiatry is named after an early case history of a psychiatrist named Sigmund Freud. Para-Freud psychiatry is defined by its elaborate system of delusions about various unconscious processes, which may differ somewhat between psychiatrists. Internal conflict, blame of the patient for being different for some unconscious ulterior motive, and the belief that rejection of there views is the result of unconscious denial and "repression" are hallmarks of pare-Freud psychiatry. Para-Freud psychiatrist typically subject patients to many long, expensive talk sessions and subtle indoctrination (in contrast to the more drastic methods used by robionic psychiatrists), though "brief therapy" is becoming more popular. Example of common para-Freud techniques and doctrines include psychoanalysis, "depth" psychology, and object relations theory.
* 669.90 Eclectic
The term eclectic psychiatry refers to all practicing psychiatrists not found in one of the other categories. To be considered eclectic, one must meet the general criteria for psychiatry disorder, but not the criteria for any (other) specific subtype.
* 669.60 Retired Psychiatry
1. A previous episode of psychiatry disorder, of any type, meeting full criteria
2. Continues to hold many of the psychiatric views, possibly in a milder form
3. No longer meet criteria B. for psychiatry disorder
Sometimes a psychiatrist will cease to be a threat to others, while maintaining some of the characteristic though patterns of psychiatry. These are referred to as retired psychiatrists.
Onset & Prognosis
There is usually a prodrome of eight or more years before full fedge psychiatry is manifest. However, some of the features of psychiatry may be seen even earlier, sometimes even at a young age. The incidence of psychiatry seems to peak around thirty years of age in both sexes, but some casesmay appear later, and a few slightly earlier (though rarely before twenty-five years of age). Despite many references to "child psychiatrists," there has never been an evidence of a child practicing psychiatry; it appear that "child psychiatrists" are simply adult psychiatrist that primarily victimize children.
Psychiatry is a very dangerous disorder, and often resistant to reason. Further, the prognosis is quite poor, with the disorder usually lasting for decades, and recovery very rarely complete - often, the best recovery that can be hoped for is a remission into the retired state. Thus, in many cases, the best thing to do with psychiatrists is simply to avoid them.
talonner
08-09-2009, 05:24 AM
Hmm. Yeah, pheromones sound real. Where are these Navy jerks getting their pheromones? It sounds like something that'd be fun to play with.
Also, I'm a bit confused. You said you had your VNO surgically removed. And now, the pheromones are still affecting you?
This was before I had it removed.
Also, they tried to take my oxytocin, those bastards.
It's definitely not the same as it used to be.
rabbit boy
08-09-2009, 05:25 AM
Talonner... the entire website is a parody.
http://isnt.autistics.org/humor.html
talonner
08-09-2009, 05:26 AM
Talonner... the entire website is a parody.
http://isnt.autistics.org/humor.html
Yes I know that.
However it is amazingly based in fact.
rabbit boy
08-09-2009, 05:31 AM
This was before I had it removed.
Also, they tried to take my oxytocin, those bastards.
It's definitely not the same as it used to be.
Why did you say "They got me again."? You had already described what they did earlier in the thread, although you didn't mention they were from the Navy.
And how did they try to take your oxytocin? I'm not sure how that can be taken from someone.
talonner
08-09-2009, 08:23 AM
Why did you say "They got me again."? You had already described what they did earlier in the thread, although you didn't mention they were from the Navy.
And how did they try to take your oxytocin? I'm not sure how that can be taken from someone.
It's a long story.
porqueno los dos?
08-09-2009, 09:01 AM
You are so full of shit talonner. I can't believe anybody in this thread is taking you seriously even one iota.
AtrainV
08-09-2009, 09:28 AM
You are so full of shit talonner. I can't believe anybody in this thread is taking you seriously even one iota.
Oh don't worry. We've known he was full of shit for a loooooong time.
rabbit boy
08-10-2009, 01:29 AM
It's a long story.
You should write a book.
Not sure he was a qualified surgeon.
Scalpel, up the nose, cut out and dig in to make sure it was gone, there is a little bit there I think. Lots of blood.
Where did you get the surgery done? But more importantly, why did you allow a person - who may not have been a surgeon - use a scalpel on you?
It's a long story.
We have plenty of free time. We're posting on Zoklet, after all.
Stock Market Anomalies
08-22-2009, 05:07 AM
They got me again.
LOL, thats because you`re autistic. :thumbsup:
Rizzo in a box
08-22-2009, 05:27 AM
Where did you get the surgery done? But more importantly, why did you allow a person - who may not have been a surgeon - use a scalpel on you?
We have plenty of free time. We're posting on Zoklet, after all.
We've got no time at all, man...
You'd better be posting as if yr life depended on it.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.