View Full Version : DNA is bullshit.
driveby
02-07-2009, 06:21 PM
They want us to believe they have magic technology, that can read the pattern of dropped DNA, and tell if someone was killed. The only thing DNA can do is solve rape. For years, I thought this, and thought I had to get rid of bodies, when I didn't have to. Even if DNA is found, they cant prove just because you were there, that you did the murder, especially if you have been there before, under legal circumstances. Ballistics is bullshit too. W&C just confirmed that for me.
Please post some more information on this DNA thing for some interested minds.
thanks
-b00m
stdismas
02-08-2009, 01:13 AM
Wow...I'd love to hear the scientific explanation behind this...
Drugie_Phish
02-08-2009, 03:41 AM
^ I want to hear the same thing too. I thought that your blood found a a crime scene could be matched to the blood in your body. I guess I was mistaken. Or the OP doesn't know what he is talking about.:facepalm:
Irukanji
02-08-2009, 05:31 AM
Your blood at a crime(murder) scene of someone you have never met before is good enough to charge you with break and entry at the least. Why else would they let you in? Also, how do you explain your fresh wounds after the guy fought you off?
stdismas
02-08-2009, 08:28 AM
Oh, sorry, I should have put *sarcastic* next to my original post. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Shulgin
02-08-2009, 11:38 AM
DNA denatures bellow boiling point but it is an effective tool for solving crime in many cases.
Obviously if he hasn't posted again hes just blurting out random absurd comments with no proof.
Turrets?
-b00m
kracker
02-08-2009, 03:51 PM
Obviously if he hasn't posted again hes just blurting out random absurd comments with no proof.
Turrets?
-b00m
I believe he's what they call a troll.:facepalm:
Bender
02-08-2009, 05:10 PM
Wow...I'd love to hear the scientific explanation behind this...
This :facepalm:
Trix Are For Kids
02-13-2009, 08:13 PM
kracker, he's no troll, he's just a punk asshole who doesn't know what he's talking about.
driveby
02-14-2009, 08:15 PM
kracker, he's no troll, he's just a punk asshole who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Says the bitch hiding behind his computer. I'm sure you all slit your wrists whenever you commit crimes, or jack off, "Aww gotta leave a piece of myself."
driveby
02-14-2009, 08:16 PM
Please post some more information on this DNA thing for some interested minds.
thanks
-b00m
I apologise for flaming you in the armoured truck thread. I am just saying, you don't pour dna around you wherever you walk.
LastHand
02-15-2009, 03:56 AM
I apologise for flaming you in the armoured truck thread. I am just saying, you don't pour dna around you wherever you walk.
Hair, Blood, Saliva, Skin, Sperm, bone, teeth, You are a walking pile of dna.... Pieces falling off randomly.
http://www.biology.arizona.edu/Human_Bio/problem_sets/DNA_forensics_2/06t.html
dysik
02-15-2009, 11:08 AM
shiiit duuud
you have to tell the lawers of the world theyve fucked up.
i dno how they missed this.
driveby
02-15-2009, 06:59 PM
Hair, Blood, Saliva, Skin, Sperm, bone, teeth, You are a walking pile of dna.... Pieces falling off randomly.
http://www.biology.arizona.edu/Human_Bio/problem_sets/DNA_forensics_2/06t.html
LOL. Idiot. Should I elaborate? No, because you are all morons. You're own link backed up what I said. Hair has no DNA, unless pulled, piss usually has little DNA. It didn't say skin cells. They would be too small to recover from crime scene. LOL @ idiot. When fingerprinted, they have to do it like 600 times before the computer accepts it, what makes you think prints recovered from a crime scene are useable? Forensics is not a majic tool that works 100% of the time. You guys are just playing yourself. Stop trying to discredit me, I am a superior member, with a 2004 registration date, and am not 16, like the rest of you. B00m, you are an idiot. I am just apologising, since unless flamed, I don't want to flame anybody, I have a coalition against flaming on zokse.
jon-eli
02-15-2009, 07:10 PM
Convictions are based on 99.9% circumstantial evidence. DNA doesn't "prove" anything... And then again, neither does a confession. You're reasoning is hopelessly silly. A conviction is the result of probabilistic guesswork. Judges/juries come up with a best-fit explanatory framework... and convict your sorry ass when it slants against your favour.
driveby
02-15-2009, 07:18 PM
Witness testimony. Also, breaking, and entering. They got Mark Geudou on rape, but gave murder punishment. No DNA from murder. No ballistics. That other one, they had someone run a wire. No DNA, no ballistics. He raped the bitch, and left semen.
It's bullshit, because the only way you're going to leave dna, is if you leave blood, semen, or saliva. It's not like you pour DNA out all the time. Most of you have probably never committed crime before.
jon-eli
02-15-2009, 07:40 PM
Most of you have probably never committed crime before.
Most of us are probably within 2 steps of 13-years-old, and therefore very likely to have committed some petty larceny, and also pretty much impervious to conviction.
We can't all be middle-aged philosophical serial-killers with a penchant for starting arguments on internet bulletin boards.
NamelessNom4d
02-15-2009, 07:46 PM
Stop trying to discredit me, I am a superior member, with a 2004 registration date, and am not 16, like the rest of you. B00m, you are an idiot. I am just apologising, since unless flamed, I don't want to flame anybody, I have a coalition against flaming on zokse.
STFU faggot. You think registration date or age matters? There are plenty of newbs here that are younger, more intelligent and overall better members than you.
Your arrogance astounds and disgusts me. In fact the only reason I even bothered to post in this thread is to flame you. I will agree that you are correct as far as your DNA point goes, but you are most certainly not superior to other members on this website, far from it in fact.
driveby
02-15-2009, 07:53 PM
You agree with my point... Why flame me? That tells me alot about you, such as how you are ruled by your irrationall emotions, and have weak tendencies.
I am not claiming there are not worthy newbs. And I will admit there are a significant amount of idiotic posters with old reg dates, but I am simply pointing out that I am superior to those who flame me, and claim my information is wrong.
The English Gentleman
02-15-2009, 07:56 PM
kracker, he's no troll, he's just a result of incest who doesn't know what he's talking about.
I fixed it for you.
Aww...Shit, Here goes the flame war, Why can't we all get along?:confused:
jon-eli
02-15-2009, 08:02 PM
This is now the kisses and cuddles thread. Example: "I don't agree with what you're saying... So let's make love. Mwah!"
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.