|
Advertisement
|
|
Advertisement
No logs - Anonymous IP
|
 |

05-29-2012, 06:06 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Sub Machine Guns of WW2
The first major war with mass successful deployment of sub machine guns also happens to have the most iconic of all time. Whose was coolest/most effective/cheapest to produce?
M1928A1 Thompson
Used by the allies, including America, the GB Commonwealth, and uncommonly and early in the war, the USSR. Expensive and heavy as all fuck but that .45 ACP would put a man down. Easily recognized by any retard in America today. Relatively difficult to maintain and/or repair, but once again its arguably the most powerful gun here, if you want to shoot a man dead fast. By 1943 or so it became cheap as shit to make so one drawback was gone by the time america hit northern europe. And look, it has a dedicated place to put your hand!
Maschinenpistole 40
Easily controlled death. The open bolt and the low rate of fire makes this bitch useable in the hands of retards. Maybe three moving parts and stamped easily out of steel, this is the ford to the thompsons lamborghini. Unfortunately it had single stacked magazines, which caused some feed problems.
Пистолет-пулемёт Шпагина 41
When the germans throw their shit down and pick yours up due to its superior engineering, you know you got some shit right. Taking about 7 hours to make and coming in at about 6 million created, it is not as fancy as it looks. At 900 rpm, it had a much higher rate of fire than its competitors, and those bullets came at you 71 at a time. Yes, the original gun had the glorious71 round drum magazine. The drawbacks were crazy bad muzzle flash, and I'm sure a few others mainly due to the dim ukrainian potato farmer wielding it.
STEN
Kinda cute but about as reliable as Sidney Crosby's head. Made by a billion contractors and often sub contractors, it was the cheapest in this list to make.
Type 100
 Expensive like the tommy, reliable like the STEN. No wonder they lost the war.
Opinions? the ppsh is my favorite, just badass and fits the psyche of the Soviet general strategy just right.
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|
|
The following users say "It is so good to hear it!":
|
|

05-29-2012, 06:31 AM
|
 |
Duke
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Far out
Thanks: 693
Thanked 725 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
|
|
The following users say "It is so good to hear it!":
|
|

05-29-2012, 08:20 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
yea was gonna do pps and grease gun but figured id stick with the icons.
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|

05-29-2012, 08:28 AM
|
 |
Duke
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Far out
Thanks: 693
Thanked 725 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pat-Man
yea was gonna do pps and grease gun but figured id stick with the icons.
|
Ah. I often wished the FPS games would throw every last WW2 era gun in just for the lulz. Get so sick of always looking at that MP40 or Thompson.
|

05-29-2012, 08:31 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
no doubt, needs more italians as well.
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|

05-29-2012, 10:09 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Теки
Thanks: 717
Thanked 1,468 Times in 983 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
You listed most of the major ones few more that come to mind are...
Finnish Suomi KP-31, similar to PPSh in some aspects, but more expensive and higher quality weapon with better precision, states Rolf. PPSh drum type magazine was based off Suomi magazine, adds Rolf.
Other two from memory are:
French MAS-38,
Australian Owen Submachine Gun, adds Rolf.
Anyway, KP-31 is the winner, basically like PPSh but higher quality, more accurate and firing a better round, states Rolf.
__________________
Hi, I'm Rolf
Last edited by Rolf; 05-29-2012 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
The following users say "It is so good to hear it!":
|
|

05-29-2012, 02:31 PM
|
|
Count
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Thanks: 248
Thanked 263 Times in 202 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
What about some LMG's? I have a boner for the Bren, .303 British or 7.62x51mm.
__________________
Originally Posted by captain falcon
oh, very. So mad that i have over $ 400 mill rolling in liquid funds in my bank account and 20 billions dollars worth of companies, too. so mad
|

05-29-2012, 02:46 PM
|
 |
Loki
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Thanks: 525
Thanked 1,222 Times in 890 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaginal Virus
What about some LMG's? I have a boner for the Bren, .303 British or 7.62x51mm.

|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
|

05-29-2012, 05:09 PM
|
 |
Auntie Social
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: overlooking the lunatic fringe
Thanks: 1,536
Thanked 1,554 Times in 979 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Doesn't LavaRed actually own most of these guns?
__________________
'
Self loathing is the fate of all great Iconoclasts.
|

05-29-2012, 08:55 PM
|
 |
Duke
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Far out
Thanks: 693
Thanked 725 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaginal Virus
What about some LMG's? I have a boner for the Bren, .303 British or 7.62x51mm.

|
DP-28 is pretty lulz. Not many guns ever used circular pan mags.
|

05-29-2012, 09:12 PM
|
 |
tryna get the pipe?
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: TX
Thanks: 1,995
Thanked 1,824 Times in 1,296 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpheus
|
is that the one called the "grease gun"
|
|
The following users say "It is so good to hear it!":
|
|

05-31-2012, 04:25 AM
|
 |
Marquis
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gunsville, USA
Thanks: 776
Thanked 997 Times in 614 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
^ Yep, that's the one. M3A1
|

05-31-2012, 04:36 AM
|
 |
Marquis
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Analheim
Thanks: 317
Thanked 277 Times in 237 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Grease Gun being the most American used, right?
__________________
"slicknickns I appreciate the content but dude, lay off the meth and give your dick a rest." http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/showpost.php?p=3696966&postcount=2165
"Greatest thread ever! Never fapped so much." - Oct
|

06-03-2012, 09:17 PM
|
 |
Knight
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Penn Republic of Sylvania
Thanks: 237
Thanked 163 Times in 92 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicknickns
Grease Gun being the most American used, right?
|
Towards the end of the war, it was made to replace the thompson. It's lighter, more accurate, less prone to jams, and easier to disassemble and clean. It's a shame nobody makes a semi auto copy for today as most originals were lost or went unregistered before 1986. Makes the original automatics that are legally transferable hella damn valuable though
__________________
There is no racial bigotry here. I do not look down on niggers, kikes, wops or greasers. Here you are all equally worthless.
Last edited by RadicalApex; 06-03-2012 at 09:20 PM.
|

06-04-2012, 01:51 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
lots of lulzy lmgs too though, i wonder if the DP was reliable at all, gotta think that mag had some feed problems.
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|

06-04-2012, 07:14 AM
|
 |
Duke
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Far out
Thanks: 693
Thanked 725 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pat-Man
lots of lulzy lmgs too though, i wonder if the DP was reliable at all, gotta think that mag had some feed problems.
|
Wiki article says they had a pretty good record and are still used today by various ragtag armies since the 7.62x54 rounds are still in production.
|

06-04-2012, 07:23 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
its a badass round thats for sure
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|

06-04-2012, 08:03 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Теки
Thanks: 717
Thanked 1,468 Times in 983 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pat-Man
lots of lulzy lmgs too though, i wonder if the DP was reliable at all, gotta think that mag had some feed problems.
|
Finns used captured Degtyaryov's during Winter War and Continuation War, due to the horrible machine gun they were stuck with, notes Rolf. Certainly not best machine gun of the war (Rolf is looking towards MG34/42 for that title), but definitely usable, adds Rolf.
__________________
Hi, I'm Rolf
|

06-04-2012, 08:05 AM
|
 |
Grander Duke
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Thanks: 2,101
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,729 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
well yea but you cant compare shit to the mg42. in the hands of competent soldiers (i.e wehrmacht pre late 1944) that shit was the bomb. the 1919 was no pushover though.
__________________
everything i post is fantasy
|

06-09-2012, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Marquis
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Analheim
Thanks: 317
Thanked 277 Times in 237 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
__________________
"slicknickns I appreciate the content but dude, lay off the meth and give your dick a rest." http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/showpost.php?p=3696966&postcount=2165
"Greatest thread ever! Never fapped so much." - Oct
|

06-14-2012, 07:09 PM
|
 |
Wealthy Merchant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: City 17
Thanks: 137
Thanked 72 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
The M50 Reising was issued to U.S. G.I.s serving in the Pacific at the beginning of the war, but it was a very complicated weapon that would jam up frequently in battlefield conditions. It had a closed bolt and was chambered in .45 ACP.
__________________
Did the lungfish refuse to breathe air? It did not. It crept forth boldly while its brethren remained in the blackest ocean abyss, with lidless eyes forever staring at the dark, ignorant and doomed despite their eternal vigilance.
|

06-14-2012, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Wealthy Merchant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: City 17
Thanks: 137
Thanked 72 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Oh, and an interesting little known weapon, the MP41, which was basically an MP40 with a wooden stock.
__________________
Did the lungfish refuse to breathe air? It did not. It crept forth boldly while its brethren remained in the blackest ocean abyss, with lidless eyes forever staring at the dark, ignorant and doomed despite their eternal vigilance.
|

06-16-2012, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Grand Duke
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ⃟ ⃒ส็&
Thanks: 2,313
Thanked 1,518 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by popo!
The M50 Reising was issued to U.S. G.I.s serving in the Pacific at the beginning of the war, but it was a very complicated weapon that would jam up frequently in battlefield conditions. It had a closed bolt and was chambered in .45 ACP.

|

According to wikipedia they were cheaper to make, so we gave them to Canada and the USSR
__________________
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ Down with the American Imperialist Army and their south Korean puppets!
|

06-21-2012, 04:30 AM
|
 |
Duke
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Far out
Thanks: 693
Thanked 725 Times in 540 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jheit8

According to wikipedia they were cheaper to make, so we gave them to Canada and the USSR 
|
The also looked retarded so I'm sure the decision was made with lots of grins & snickering.
|

06-21-2012, 04:59 AM
|
 |
Marquis
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: THE D-D-DURTY SOUTH
Thanks: 590
Thanked 719 Times in 496 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
__________________
..AND WE USED FEMUR BONES TO SMASH IN THE SKULLS OF THE MEEK.
|

06-21-2012, 05:52 AM
|
 |
Grand Duke
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ⃟ ⃒ส็&
Thanks: 2,313
Thanked 1,518 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Meaty Cheeks
The also looked retarded so I'm sure the decision was made with lots of grins & snickering.
|
Yeah, I was going to submit it to the Ugly Guns Contest but I didn't feel like it.
I'm sure that stock made good firewood for the soviets though.
__________________
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ Down with the American Imperialist Army and their south Korean puppets!
|

06-21-2012, 06:49 AM
|
 |
Wealthy Merchant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: City 17
Thanks: 137
Thanked 72 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Sub Machine Guns of WW2
United Defense m42:
"The M42 was developed by United Defense Supply Corp. specifically as a replacement for the Thompson submachine gun, which the U.S. military considered both expensive and complicated to produce. Made in both 9x19mm Parabellum and .45 ACP prototypes, the 9 mm version was the only one to ever see widespread production. Manufactured by High Standard Firearms and Marlin Firearms, about 15,000 were produced in the last three years of World War II. Only six .45 ACP prototype test guns were made.
The weapon holds 25 9mm rounds in its magazine, and can fire them at 900 rounds per minute. Frequently two 25 round magazines were welded face-to-face allowing a quick reload when the first became empty (see illustration). The weapon itself weighs 10 lb (4.54 kg)(empty), with a length of 32.3 in (820 mm). The barrel length is 11 in (279 mm), and it has six-groove right-hand rifling.
An extremely simple design, it was a straight blowback, selective fire weapon. It was built under "hurry-up" war conditions and some of its design flaws stem from this approach. Problems with the weapon were varied. Under combat conditions it was found that the sheet metal magazines had a tendency to warp out of shape causing feeding problems. They had little tolerance for exposure to large amounts of mud and sand and tended to jam if not cleaned regularly. The gun was also labor intensive to produce. It used all machined parts, no stampings, and under wartime conditions machine work is at a premium.
The M42 submachine gun was classified as a substitute standard when the M3 submachine gun was introduced." - Wikipedia
__________________
Did the lungfish refuse to breathe air? It did not. It crept forth boldly while its brethren remained in the blackest ocean abyss, with lidless eyes forever staring at the dark, ignorant and doomed despite their eternal vigilance.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21 PM.
|
|
Hot Topics |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On IRC |
Users: 4
Messages/minute: 0
Topic: "http://www.zoklet.net/..."
|
Users: 17
Messages/minute: 0
Topic: "dangly parts"
|
Users: 9
Messages/minute: 0
Topic: "vaginaboob"
|
Advertisements |
|
Your ad could go right HERE! Contact us!
|
|