This Thursday Healthcare decision!!

[Tachosomoza]

I didn't say it's bad, it's hypocritical to the anarcho-capitalist libertarian nonsense he spews here, though. A poor person who's pro rich is a retard.

[crazzyass]

Originally Posted by dephdiddy

You add subsidized like it's bad thing. When I have company I often show off my impressive roof. I call it my tax-shelter.

Nothing wrong with it at all; it's only wrong when you scream about welfare leeches and you're one yourself, per your own definition.

[Malice]

Originally Posted by crazzyass

I sorta feel bad for you. You need to get out some, get a little drunk, see the world. Realize that sitting around in a basement hating everything isn't a good way to live life.

I don't hate everything, I'm not in a basement, not that there would be anything wrong with it if I was, and getting drunk seems to be for chumps, I doubt it's worth doing.

[crazzyass]

Originally Posted by Malice

I don't hate everything, I'm not in a basement, not that there would be anything wrong with it if I was, and getting drunk seems to be for chumps, I doubt it's worth doing.

Right. Give it a try and see what happens.

Deciding shit is stupid without ever trying it is for chumps.

[Tachosomoza]

I'll get drunk with you malice.

[Struwwelpeter]

My man Malice going to work on you dumbasses.

[Cory]

Answer the question Malice: Are you saying you now support the maintenance of the current welfare organizations? Or are you applying one set of rules to yourself and another to everyone else?

[Malice]

No, I don't support the maintenance of organizations that are coercively funded. Of course voluntarily funded organizations could remain, although I would like to see Greenpeace nuked.

I don't think this would be hard for individuals to voluntarily handle. If necessary Romney and other job creators like him would use their own hard earned wealth to take help others.

[crazzyass]

Originally Posted by Malice

No, I don't support the maintenance of organizations that are coercively funded. Of course voluntarily funded organizations could remain, although I would like to see Greenpeace nuked.

I don't think this would be hard for individuals to voluntarily handle. If necessary Romney and other job creators like him would use their own hard earned wealth to take help others.

So you're counting on ol' Mitt to give you a handout personally out of the goodness of his own pure little heart when you get your welfare taken away?

Good luck with that.

[Struwwelpeter]

No one's welfare would be taken away seeing as there is nothing coercive about welfare, it is paid for with money that is neither earned nor taxed by anyone.

[Cory]

Originally Posted by Malice

No, I don't support the maintenance of organizations that are coercively funded.

So you do in fact have one set of rules for you and another for everyone else? So pretty much "it's okay when I do it" is the logic here? Kinda like in another thread when you said you would set up a dictatorship under yourself if you could, but that being said it's still bad whenever someone else does it? I think a clear trend is emerging here.

[Fox News]

Originally Posted by Tachosomoza

A poor person who's pro rich is a retard.

Its called having a job retard

[slicknickns]

Cory is the smartest poster on Zoklet

[Tachosomoza]

Originally Posted by Fox News

Its called having a job retard

[JeffreyH]

Originally Posted by Morb

Yep, that just about finishes it. America will never recover from this precedent, what has been set in motion now cannot be reversed. The left has pretty much won the war, and now the entire western world is at their mercy.

Time to get out the popcorn, kick back, and watch the new world order take shape in earnest now.

Or just move to China now. They are much more capitalist than Europe.

[JeffreyH]

Originally Posted by IIIII

We all know that cons love war and the aftermath that is used as a reason for more war.

They are blaming the wrong guy. They cannot blame capitalism for these things because they were not caused by the failure of capitalism, but by the failure of government "welfare" policies.

[Rust]

Originally Posted by JeffreyH

They cannot blame capitalism for these things because they were not caused by the failure of capitalism...

You're right. That's not a failure of capitalism. It's capitalism.

[Tachosomoza]

Originally Posted by JeffreyH

They are blaming the wrong guy. They cannot blame capitalism for these things because they were not caused by the failure of capitalism, but by the failure of government "welfare" policies.

50% of Congress being millionaires and 22 empty homes for every homeless person is a failure of welfare?

[JeffreyH]

Originally Posted by Tachosomoza

50% of Congress being millionaires and 22 empty homes for every homeless person is a failure of welfare?

Yes. How do you think the housing bubble was created?

[LSA King]

Originally Posted by JeffreyH

Yes. How do you think the housing bubble was created?

I don't think he understands how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac worked and how involved the government is in the corporate world. Fascism = the merging of corporatism w/ government. In the literal sense we aren't a capitalist country anymore, rather more in tune with that of true fascism minus the mass murder.

[Rust]

Originally Posted by JeffreyH

Yes. How do you think the housing bubble was created?

You're right. Congress was full of poor people before the housing bubble.

[Malice]

Bill O'Reilly, Constitutional Scholar - YouTube

Bill O'Reilly, Constitutional Scholar - YouTube
Video: click to display