Mitt Romeny picks Paul Ryan as VP (reportedly)

[DiStOrTiOn]

Originally Posted by crazymike

The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, said, “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” She was one of eleven children and associated all sorts of social ills with having large families. She thought that if people would just keep their families limited to two children, we wouldn’t have to deal with domestic violence, poverty or unemployment.

Sanger’s solution, which was shared by other eugenicists, was to curb the population rate of those who were “unfit” and “feebleminded” through the distribution of birth control and access to sterilization and eventually abortion. She talked about ways to solve the “Negro problem” in the U.S. since she viewed them as “human weeds” and “reckless breeders.” She even thought that there were some people who were so “unfit” that they should not be allowed to have any kids at all and should submit to forced sterilization.

In her opinion, those who chose sterilization should be rewarded. It sounds pretty harsh, but she was only being consistent with Darwinism and its “survival of the fittest” mentality since she viewed blacks as inferior to whites and therefore “unfit.” For the past several decades, the left have cleverly turned this into a woman’s rights, “my body, my choice” issue and have conveniently forgotten about the original racist agenda. But some people, like this abortionist, are more open and honest about it.

those are actually really good points. I am 100% in favor of government-provided birth control for the masses. Especially for mexi-niggers in particular.

I am also in favor of a 2 child per couple limit. Especially for mexi's and nig'ers. Although I'd prefer it to be limited to 0 for mexi-niggers at the very low end of the poverty line

[crazzyass]

Originally Posted by TheRascalKing

Bush and Quayle weren't running against an incumbent.

And Dukakis wasn't the best candidate either.

Originally Posted by Malice

What makes you think that Obamacare is a good thing? Where's the cost containment mechanism? How is single payer structured? You can't have a good overview of a policy unless you also read criticisms of it.

It isn't single-payer, you dolt. Eating up libertarian/conservative talking points doesn't give you a good overview of a policy either.

[Malice]

I never said it was. I'm pointing to the differences between it and single-payer and why it doesn't make sense to expect it to constrain prices and, more arguably, lead to better outcomes.

[crazzyass]

Originally Posted by Malice

I never said it was. I'm pointing to the differences between it and single-payer and why it doesn't make sense to expect it to constrain prices and, more arguably, lead to better outcomes.

What does it have to do with single-payer? Differences between it and single-payer are irrelevant to an analysis of just Obamacare, unless you wish to compare the two. In your mind, single-payer is much worse, so why have that conversation at all?

Costs are reduced by having more people paying for their healthcare, instead of tens of millions of people who either choose to not purchase insurance or can't afford it pushing up costs for everyone when they get sick. By spreading the cost around, it is reduced for each person. Other laws, like mandating certain percentages of premiums must be spent on healthcare, insures people get what they pay for and all their money isn't eaten up in overhead and profit.