Theory of knowledge

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Xlite

Yea, but i don't care what you think about me, i care about what you think you know to be true. And you're still stalling.

Get on with the truth already.

Why put into words what you are already thinking I think the pinnacle of knowledge is?

[Lanny]

Can we keep this on topic? Sexybeast, if you don't have anything on topic to say (and you haven't said anything even remotely on topic in this thread), go somewhere else. Everyone else, don't feed the troll.

[Xlite]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

Why put into words what you are already thinking I think the pinnacle of knowledge is?

But i'm not thinking what you are thinking because i don't know what you are thinking, because you haven't said what you are thinking.

Again, what is your definition of the truth in question?

Originally Posted by Lanny

Everyone else, don't feed the troll.

All right i'l stop.. soon.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Xlite

But i'm not thinking what you are thinking because i don't know what you are thinking, because you haven't said what you are thinking.

Again, what is your definition of the truth in question?




All right i'l stop.. soon.

The pinnacle of knowledge is the Truth.

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

I think both of you already know what the pinnacle of knowledge is, but you both have yet to reach it.

In an attempt to salvage this thread from your stupid fucking trolling, here is my opinion.

Knowledge for me doesn't have anything to do with truth; knowledge is more like the concept of qualia. There is no such thing as a pinnacle of qualia since it is based on the quality rather than a scale. I think that every facet of existence, if I had to slap a label on it, is subject to variance and change, so every qualia is unique at some level. You could say that you could experience the qualia of the entirety of existence, but I wouldn't believe you. You can create an aesthetics feeling of doing so, but that don't make it so. I would say it is intrinsically unknowable as a sensation, but is still available as a motif. Truth is more or less meaningless as a concept so far as I am concerned. It is a slave assessment after the fact, and a slave doesn't have any direct apprehension of reality.

[Xlite]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

The pinnacle of knowledge is the Truth.

And what do you think the pinnacle of knowledge is? and what makes you believe its the truth?

You're nothing more than a troll who thinks he knows something, when you are in fact clueless.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Dionysus

In an attempt to salvage this thread from your stupid fucking trolling, here is my opinion.

Knowledge for me doesn't have anything to do with truth; knowledge is more like the concept of qualia. There is no such thing as a pinnacle of qualia since it is based on the quality rather than a scale. I think that every facet of existence, if I had to slap a label on it, is subject to variance and change, so every qualia is unique at some level. You could say that you could experience the qualia of the entirety of existence, but I wouldn't believe you. You can create an aesthetics feeling of doing so, but that don't make it so. I would say it is intrinsically unknowable as a sensation, but is still available as a motif. Truth is more or less meaningless as a concept so far as I am concerned. It is a slave assessment after the fact, and a slave doesn't have any direct apprehension of reality.

Way to pick the stupidest paradox available to human thought as your truth: the truth is meaningless but I still think that that is the truth, but it's meaningless so it isn't really the truth.

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

Way to pick the stupidest paradox available to human thought as your truth: the truth is meaningless but I still think that that is the truth, but it's meaningless so it isn't really the truth.

Damn nigga you is stupid. Maybe you should educate yourself on what qualia actually means. For the purposes of my definition, knowledge is the process of acquiring http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia. I didn't say anything about truth. It is just a paradox to you because you are either trolling, or you are missing a chromosome, or possibly both. I get the sneaking suspicion that each post you get as a response leads you one stroke closer to ejaculation. I think maybe we aught to stop feeding/jacking off the troll, cause like I said this thread is actually halfway interesting.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Dionysus

In an attempt to salvage this thread from your stupid fucking trolling, here is my opinion.

Knowledge for me doesn't have anything to do with truth; knowledge is more like the concept of qualia. There is no such thing as a pinnacle of qualia since it is based on the quality rather than a scale. I think that every facet of existence, if I had to slap a label on it, is subject to variance and change, so every qualia is unique at some level. You could say that you could experience the qualia of the entirety of existence, but I wouldn't believe you. You can create an aesthetics feeling of doing so, but that don't make it so. I would say it is intrinsically unknowable as a sensation, but is still available as a motif. Truth is more or less meaningless as a concept so far as I am concerned. It is a slave assessment after the fact, and a slave doesn't have any direct apprehension of reality.

Originally Posted by Dionysus

Damn nigga you is stupid. Maybe you should educate yourself on what qualia actually means. For the purposes of my definition, knowledge is the process of acquiring http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia. I didn't say anything about truth. It is just a paradox to you because you are either trolling, or you are missing a chromosome, or possibly both. I get the sneaking suspicion that each post you get as a response leads you one stroke closer to ejaculation. I think maybe we aught to stop feeding/jacking off the troll, cause like I said this thread is actually halfway interesting.

Did I cause you a bit of cognitive dissonance there bud?

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

Did I cause you a bit of cognitive dissonance there bud?

I don't have to explain myself to you. I made that post like 10 minutes ago anyway. Maybe you should start thinking on your feet rather than out your peferated asshole.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Dionysus

I don't have to explain myself to you. I made that post like 10 minutes ago anyway. Maybe you should start thinking on your feet rather than out your peferated asshole.

You couldn't explain yourself to me if you wanted to because your beliefs are a quagmire of illusions and absurdities.

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

You couldn't explain yourself to me if you wanted to because your beliefs are a quagmire of illusions and absurdities.

I don't have any beliefs. I have opinions and speculations. You have herps and fucking excrement covered hopes and molested fantasies. It is bad for the soul, which I am sure you don't have since victims of domestic rape don't have souls.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Dionysus

I don't have any beliefs. I have opinions and speculations. You have herps and fucking excrement covered hopes and molested fantasies. It is bad for the soul, which I am sure you don't have since victims of domestic rape don't have souls.

You just spilled some beliefs about me. More cognitive dissonance spewing from your mouth.

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

I just spilled some semen about me. More ejaculate dissonance spewing in my mouth.

fixd