I found out the source of the voices in my head

[sepht]

I was thinking about the power of thought that an organism can have on another creature.

Then I thought "What is the largest, most dominant creature on this planet that has the power to sway the minds of everything living on it."

I realized that Earth is actually a living organism with a mind.

This voices in my head...they are from mother Earth

I'm On The Outside Looking In - YouTube

I'm On The Outside Looking In - YouTube
Video: click to display

[sexually vulnerable CPR dummy]

no, the voices in your head is schizophrenia

[HampTheToker]

If you hear voices in your head, it is because you have a mental illness.

[sepht]

btw that guy is singing about the sun :v

[Zanick]

Interesting. What does she have to say?

[sepht]

Originally Posted by zanick

Interesting. What does she have to say?

stop killing me please thanks

and the sun is all "damn those monkey are so dumb. Seriously they so dumb. Sheeeeeet"

[Cerberus]

There's a microchip in there, you have to dig it out.

[sepht]

Originally Posted by Cerberus

There's a microchip in there, you have to dig it out.

i think the sheer overwhelming force of celestial bodies can override whatever the fuck simple human minds can think up right now

http://atlantisandbeyond.bravehost.c...rebellion.html

[Figure-8]

Yep, all energies are rising. If you do not hear your own thoughts manifested, you are insane and cut off from your true nature and the true capabilities of your mind.

Only when you sleep, does it switch on. It should be at will.

[Flatland]

Originally Posted by HampTheToker

If you hear voices in your head, it is because you have a mental illness.

I hear my voice in my head

[Duke Zion]

Don't be blaming the voices in your head for your dog fucking activities.

[Pee Vee Proots, M.D.]

Originally Posted by Flatland

I hear my voice in my head

Most people do.

Don't they?

Ricky Gervais relentlessly mocked Karl Pilkington for thinking in sentences/his voice rather than "thinking in abstractions" as he put it. I think that makes Ricky the retard though. He thinks in sentence fragments. Poor bastard.

[Figure-8]

Everybody's retarded, see?

And what can you think in? A voice, pictures, layers of thoughts, words, ideas or feelings?

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Pee Vee Proots, M.D.

Most people do.

Don't they?

Ricky Gervais relentlessly mocked Karl Pilkington for thinking in sentences/his voice rather than "thinking in abstractions" as he put it. I think that makes Ricky the retard though. He thinks in sentence fragments. Poor bastard.

One of those people can only think as fast as they can speak or read, while the other has the ability to think up entire ideas in a fraction of the time because he is in fact thinking outside of time. In the time it took Karl to think out one sentence of a thought, Ricky could have thought about a whole conversation in the abstract.

[Pee Vee Proots, M.D.]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

One of those people can only think as fast as they can speak or read, while the other has the ability to think up entire ideas in a fraction of the time because he is in fact thinking outside of time. In the time it took Karl to think out one sentence of a thought, Ricky could have thought about a whole conversation in the abstract.

I can't say for certain because I tend to think in full, beautiful sentences... but I'd wager what Ricky does is think in key words, which he then elaborates on during conversation. Which isn't "beyond time". It's time saving I guess?

Christ. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I didn't mean to spread the hate haha. You don't have any super powers though - you don't think "beyond time".

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Pee Vee Proots, M.D.

I can't say for certain because I tend to think in full, beautiful sentences... but I'd wager what Ricky does is think in key words, which he then elaborates on during conversation. Which isn't "beyond time". It's time saving I guess?

Christ. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I didn't mean to spread the hate haha. You don't have any super powers though - you don't think "beyond time".

What I mean by that is if you asked me to think about a movie I had seen, it would be one thought that comprises the entirety of the movie in a few milliseconds, which is far, far more time efficient than thinking in your head "Oh yeah, that's that movie about blah blah blah". I think the main difference here is that I think like I'm thinking while you think like you're communicating or giving a monologue.

[curioushat]

Schizophrenia?

[Pee Vee Proots, M.D.]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

What I mean by that is if you asked me to think about a movie I had seen, it would be one thought that comprises the entirety of the movie in a few milliseconds, which is far, far more time efficient than thinking in your head "Oh yeah, that's that movie about blah blah blah". I think the main difference here is that I think like I'm thinking while you think like you're communicating or giving a monologue.

Hmm. I don't know - see I'd respond the same way If asked about a movie. Or a song. Or a piece of art. Or a memory. I'd just imagine it, yeah. That's not thinking, that's memory. Hell I'd do both at once. I'd do that millisecond abstraction (memory recall) and start my internal dialog up.

I'm pretty sure Ricky burst out laughing at the thought of Karl sitting on a park bench thinking about what was going on around him in sentences. The sense I got from the exchange was that people never do this, including during conversations or monologues in their head. Like their monologue is just abstractions. Which to be honest sounds damn boring.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Pee Vee Proots, M.D.

Hmm. I don't know - see I'd respond the same way If asked about a movie. Or a song. Or a piece of art. Or a memory. I'd just imagine it, yeah. That's not thinking, that's memory. Hell I'd do both at once. I'd do that millisecond abstraction (memory recall) and start my internal dialog up.

I'm pretty sure Ricky burst out laughing at the thought of Karl sitting on a park bench thinking about what was going on around him in sentences. The sense I got from the exchange was that people never do this, including during conversations or monologues in their head. Like their monologue is just abstractions. Which to be honest sounds damn boring.

So if we were sitting on a park bench and a man walked passed us, would you think "A man just walked by" or would you simply just "know" a man walked by?

[Pee Vee Proots, M.D.]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

So if we were sitting on a park bench and a man walked passed us, would you think "A man just walked by" or would you simply just "know" a man walked by?

Both? I couldn't think "a man just walked by" if I didn't already know it. Of course I probably wouldn't think "a man just walked by", because that's redundant and pointless. If the man had an interesting hair-do I might think to myself "damn look at that punk mofo and his big ass mohawk" or something.

It all depends on whether what I observe is of interest enough to take note of. I think this all boils down to Ricky Gervais being a dick to get laughs. Karl is just fascinated by small things, and actively comments on them in his mind. Thank you fine sir for clearing this up.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Pee Vee Proots, M.D.

Both? I couldn't think "a man just walked by" if I didn't already know it. Of course I probably wouldn't think "a man just walked by", because that's redundant and pointless. If the man had an interesting hair-do I might think to myself "damn look at that punk mofo and his big ass mohawk" or something.

It all depends on whether what I observe is of interest enough to take note of. I think this all boils down to Ricky Gervais being a dick to get laughs. Karl is just fascinated by small things, and actively comments on them in his mind. Thank you fine sir for clearing this up.

It still seems redundant and slow to give your opinion to yourself if you already know your opinion instantly upon seeing said punk mofo's mohawk. Making said comment to someone sitting next to you on the bench makes much more sense.

[Pee Vee Proots, M.D.]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

It still seems redundant and slow to give your opinion to yourself if you already know your opinion instantly upon seeing said punk mofo's mohawk. Making said comment to someone sitting next to you on the bench makes much more sense.

I am the person sitting next to me on the bench. Partly that I'm fat, partly that I have no friends except me inside my own head.

STILL... THAT FELLOW IN MY HEAD IS GREAT COMPANY.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by Pee Vee Proots, M.D.

I am the person sitting next to me on the bench. Partly that I'm fat, partly that I have no friends except me inside my own head.

STILL... THAT FELLOW IN MY HEAD IS GREAT COMPANY.

Ironic that the topic of this thread is about having more than just "you" in your own head while you mention it's just you inside your head. I wonder if you and the OP switched places for a period of time what opinions you guys would formulate about each other's mental (or spiritual in OP's case) existences.

[sepht]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

Ironic that the topic of this thread is about having more than just "you" in your own head while you mention it's just you inside your head. I wonder if you and the OP switched places for a period of time what opinions you guys would formulate about each other's mental (or spiritual in OP's case) existences.

have you ever been in all places at the same time?

Imagine yourself in a bubble within a sea of bubbles like a campaign glass. Guess what happens when you pop the bubble you're in.

[TheSexyBeast821]

Originally Posted by sepht

have you ever been in all places at the same time?

Imagine yourself in a bubble within a sea of bubbles like a campaign glass. Guess what happens when you pop the bubble you're in.

So you're alluding to a glass of champagne being like a sea of consciousness where some people are inside their own individual bubbles while others aren't in a bubble and are part of the whole of the champagne sea? That would mean consciousness were everywhere in the universe (or on Earth if you think it has to be linked to organic life) and would comprise every thought and all knowledge. I think the word for such a large, omnipresent, omniscient consciousness is God.

[sepht]

Originally Posted by TheSexyBeast821

So you're alluding to a glass of champagne being like a sea of consciousness where some people are inside their own individual bubbles while others aren't in a bubble and are part of the whole of the champagne sea? That would mean consciousness were everywhere in the universe (or on Earth if you think it has to be linked to organic life) and would comprise every thought and all knowledge. I think the word for such a large, omnipresent, omniscient consciousness is God.

drink the champagne for it is the nectar of the gods